比特派app下载安卓|solidarity
比特派app下载安卓|solidarity
作者： 比特派app下载安卓
2024-03-09 21:01:42
SOLIDARITY中文(简体)翻译：剑桥词典
SOLIDARITY中文(简体)翻译：剑桥词典
词典
翻译
语法
同义词词典
+Plus
剑桥词典+Plus
Shop
剑桥词典+Plus
我的主页
+Plus 帮助
退出
剑桥词典+Plus
我的主页
+Plus 帮助
退出
登录
/
注册
中文 (简体)
查找
查找
英语-中文（简体）
solidarity 在英语-中文（简体）词典中的翻译
solidaritynoun [ U ] uk
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɒl.ɪˈdær.ə.ti/ us
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɑː.lɪˈder.ə.t̬i/
Add to word list
Add to word list
C1 agreement between and support for the members of a group, especially a political group
团结一致
The situation raises important questions about solidarity among member states of the UN.
当前形势对联合国成员国能否团结一致这一重要问题提出了质疑。
The purpose of the speech was to show solidarity with the country's leaders.
这场演讲的目的是为了表示与国家领导人团结一致。
(solidarity在剑桥英语-中文（简体）词典的翻译 © Cambridge University Press)
solidarity的例句
solidarity
The latter response is reinforced in us by our obligation to stand in solidarity with victims of wrongdoing against those who have wronged them.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
As the structural dimension of solidarity had not strengthened, it was not surprising that the third hypotheses also had to be rejected.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
In terms of solidarity, the free rider has two options.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
They then use this model in crafting their solidarity activities and in dispensing resources.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
The relationship will not always exclude maintenance of traditional clientelistic ties or ethnic solidarity.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
In reality, a great number of households depend on both a good monetary income and a functional solidarity system inside and outside the home.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
The motivation is more to do with protecting the inherited connection between social solidarity and national sovereignty.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
However, future studies offer the potential to compare the effects of, for example, civic duty, neighbourhood solidarity and close election messages.
来自 Cambridge English Corpus
示例中的观点不代表剑桥词典编辑、剑桥大学出版社和其许可证颁发者的观点。
C1
solidarity的翻译
中文（繁体）
團結一致…
查看更多内容
西班牙语
solidaridad…
查看更多内容
葡萄牙语
solidariedade…
查看更多内容
更多语言
in Marathi
土耳其语
法语
in Dutch
in Tamil
in Hindi
in Gujarati
丹麦语
in Swedish
马来语
德语
挪威语
in Urdu
in Ukrainian
俄语
in Telugu
in Bengali
捷克语
印尼语
泰语
越南语
波兰语
एकजूट, गटाच्या सदस्यांमधील करार आणि समर्थन, विशेषत: राजकीय गट…
查看更多内容
dayanışma, birlik, yekvücut olma…
查看更多内容
solidarité…
查看更多内容
solidariteit…
查看更多内容
ஒரு குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு, குறிப்பாக ஒரு அரசியல் குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு இடையே உடன்பாடு மற்றும் ஆதரவு…
查看更多内容
(प्रायः राजनीतिक) एकजुटता…
查看更多内容
એકતા, ઐક્ય…
查看更多内容
solidaritet…
查看更多内容
solidaritet, samhörighetskänsla…
查看更多内容
perpaduan…
查看更多内容
der Zusammenhalt…
查看更多内容
solidaritet, fellesskapsfølelse…
查看更多内容
یکجہتی, ہم آہنگی…
查看更多内容
солідарність, згуртованість…
查看更多内容
солидарность…
查看更多内容
సమూహానికి, ముఖ్యంగా రాజకీయ సమూహానికి చెందిన సభ్యుల మధ్య ఒప్పందం, ఒకరికొకరి మద్దతు…
查看更多内容
সংহতি…
查看更多内容
soudržnost…
查看更多内容
solidaritas…
查看更多内容
ความสามัคคี…
查看更多内容
tình đoàn kết…
查看更多内容
solidarność…
查看更多内容
需要一个翻译器吗？
获得快速、免费的翻译！
翻译器工具
solidarity的发音是什么？
在英语词典中查看 solidarity 的释义
浏览
solid
solid fuel
solid-state
solid-state drive
solidarity
solidification
solidify
solidity
solidly
“每日一词”
flexitarian
A flexitarian way of eating consists mainly of vegetarian food but with some meat.
关于这个
博客
Forget doing it or forget to do it? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (2)
March 06, 2024
查看更多
新词
stochastic parrot
March 04, 2024
查看更多
已添加至 list
回到页面顶端
内容
英语-中文（简体）例句翻译
©剑桥大学出版社与评估2024
学习
学习
学习
新词
帮助
纸质书出版
Word of the Year 2021
Word of the Year 2022
Word of the Year 2023
开发
开发
开发
词典API
双击查看
搜索Widgets
执照数据
关于
关于
关于
无障碍阅读
剑桥英语教学
剑桥大学出版社与评估
授权管理
Cookies与隐私保护
语料库
使用条款
京ICP备14002226号-2
©剑桥大学出版社与评估2024
剑桥词典+Plus
我的主页
+Plus 帮助
退出
词典
定义
清晰解释自然的书面和口头英语
英语
学习词典
基础英式英语
基础美式英语
翻译
点击箭头改变翻译方向。
双语词典
英语-中文（简体）
Chinese (Simplified)–English
英语-中文（繁体）
Chinese (Traditional)–English
英语-荷兰语
荷兰语-英语
英语-法语
法语-英语
英语-德语
德语-英语
英语-印尼语
印尼语-英语
英语-意大利语
意大利语-英语
英语-日语
日语-英语
英语-挪威语
挪威语-英语
英语-波兰语
波兰语-英语
英语-葡萄牙语
葡萄牙语-英语
英语-西班牙语
西班牙语-英语
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
半双语词典
英语-阿拉伯语
英语-孟加拉语
英语-加泰罗尼亚语
英语-捷克语
英语-丹麦语
English–Gujarati
英语-印地语
英语-韩语
英语-马来语
英语-马拉地语
英语-俄语
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
英语-泰语
英语-土耳其语
英语-乌克兰语
English–Urdu
英语-越南语
翻译
语法
同义词词典
Pronunciation
剑桥词典+Plus
Shop
剑桥词典+Plus
我的主页
+Plus 帮助
退出
登录 /
注册
中文 (简体)
Change
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
中文 (简体)
正體中文 (繁體)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
हिंदी
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
关注我们
选择一本词典
最近的词和建议
定义
清晰解释自然的书面和口头英语
英语
学习词典
基础英式英语
基础美式英语
语法与同义词词典
对自然书面和口头英语用法的解释
英语语法
同义词词典
Pronunciation
British and American pronunciations with audio
English Pronunciation
翻译
点击箭头改变翻译方向。
双语词典
英语-中文（简体）
Chinese (Simplified)–English
英语-中文（繁体）
Chinese (Traditional)–English
英语-荷兰语
荷兰语-英语
英语-法语
法语-英语
英语-德语
德语-英语
英语-印尼语
印尼语-英语
英语-意大利语
意大利语-英语
英语-日语
日语-英语
英语-挪威语
挪威语-英语
英语-波兰语
波兰语-英语
英语-葡萄牙语
葡萄牙语-英语
英语-西班牙语
西班牙语-英语
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
半双语词典
英语-阿拉伯语
英语-孟加拉语
英语-加泰罗尼亚语
英语-捷克语
英语-丹麦语
English–Gujarati
英语-印地语
英语-韩语
英语-马来语
英语-马拉地语
英语-俄语
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
英语-泰语
英语-土耳其语
英语-乌克兰语
English–Urdu
英语-越南语
词典+Plus
词汇表
选择语言
中文 (简体)
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
正體中文 (繁體)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
हिंदी
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
内容
英语-中文（简体）
Noun
例句
Translations
语法
所有翻译
我的词汇表
把solidarity添加到下面的一个词汇表中，或者创建一个新词汇表。
更多词汇表
前往词汇表
对该例句有想法吗？
例句中的单词与输入词条不匹配。
该例句含有令人反感的内容。
取消
提交
例句中的单词与输入词条不匹配。
该例句含有令人反感的内容。
取消
提交
solidarity是什么意思_solidarity的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在线词典
darity是什么意思_solidarity的翻译_音标_读音_用法_例句_爱词霸在线词典首页翻译背单词写作校对词霸下载用户反馈专栏平台登录solidarity是什么意思_solidarity用英语怎么说_solidarity的翻译_solidarity翻译成_solidarity的中文意思_solidarity怎么读,solidarity的读音,solidarity的用法,solidarity的例句翻译人工翻译试试人工翻译翻译全文简明柯林斯牛津solidarityCET6/考研/GRE/TOEFL/IELTS英 [ˌsɒlɪˈdærəti]美 [ˌsɑːlɪˈdærəti]释义n.团结点击 人工翻译，了解更多 人工释义词态变化复数: solidarities;实用场景例句全部团结community solidarity社群团结牛津词典to express/show solidarity with sb表示 / 表明支持某人牛津词典Demonstrations were held as a gesture of solidarity with the hunger strikers.人们举行示威游行，以表示对绝食抗议者的支持。牛津词典Supporters want to march tomorrow to show solidarity with their leaders.为了显示和领袖的同心同德，支持者们希望明天举行游行。柯林斯高阶英语词典What is needed is mutual encouragement, solidarity, and practical organization.我们需要的是一个互勉 、 团结 、 实干的组织.期刊摘选Part of the General Programme of the draft Constitution dwells on Party solidarity and unity.在党章草案的总纲中有一部分是说明党的团结和统一的.期刊摘选The suicide bomber detonated his explosives at a Shi'ite rally expressing solidarity with the Palestinian people.自杀炸弹杀手在一个什叶派支持巴勒斯坦人的集会上引爆炸弹.期刊摘选We respect knowledge and personality cry up collective power, solidarity and cooperation all the more.我们尊重知识、尊重个性,更推崇集体力量 、 团结协作.期刊摘选Fourthly, the Shanghai Expo will promote confidence and solidarity in meeting global challenges.第四, 上海世博会将凝聚信心力量,团结应对挑战.期刊摘选The perennial conflict between national egoism and international solidarity becomes and more visible.国家利己主义和国际的团结之间的长期冲突变得越来越明显.期刊摘选The solidarity among China's various nationalities is as firm as a rock.中国各族人民之间的团结坚如磐石.《现代汉英综合大词典》Any political entity would invoke religious solidarity to muster its strength in numbers.政治组织更不惜利用宗教来招兵买马和团结人心.期刊摘选He therefore showed little interest in the gestures of active solidarity from Madrid.因此,他对于马德里的这副积极拉拢的姿态并不怎么感兴趣.辞典例句That is an uncomfortable reminder of the way group solidarity works in America.这对于在美国进行的种族团结而言,可不是一个令其愉快的消息.期刊摘选We will resolutely oppose any activity aimed at splitting the motherland or undermining ethnic solidarity.坚决反对分裂祖国和破坏民族团结的行为.期刊摘选The fourth is over how to reinforce solidarity.第四个选择是如何巩固团结.期刊摘选The ideas of communist solidarity and laying low to focus on modernization are becoming obsolete.共产主义团结以及不重视现代化的理念已经变得过时.期刊摘选Such a vision of the solidarity of life had never before come to Lily.这种人与人之间休戚相关的关系是丽莉以前从未体验过的.辞典例句In southern Europe, solidarity is measured in the billions sent by the EU to needy governments.南欧团结一致是用欧盟送给有需要的政府数十亿欧元来衡量的.期刊摘选In brotherly love there is the experience of union with all men , of human solidarity.手足之爱包括同所有人和睦相处, 团结一致.期刊摘选On our heads, and the certificate the basketball game last week, with all our solidarity disclosed.我们头顶上的这些奖状, 以及上个星期的篮球赛, 无不透漏着我们所有人团结的力量.期刊摘选They must preserve their solidarity.他们必须维护他们的团结.《简明英汉词典》Though the bloodiness of the earthquake, Chinese nationality show the huge solidarity.虽然这次残酷的残酷, 中华民族显示出了强大的团结.期刊摘选The great friendship and militant solidarity between the peoples of our two countries are unbreakable.我们两国人民的伟大友谊与战斗团结是坚不可摧的.《现代汉英综合大词典》Supporters want to march tomorrow to show solidarity with their leaders.为了显示和领袖的同心同德，支持者们希望明天举行游行。柯林斯例句Drivers honked their horns in solidarity with the peace marchers.司机按响汽车喇叭，支持反战示威游行者。柯林斯例句There was a degree of solidarity and sisterhood among the women.这些女人之间存在着一定程度的团结精神和姐妹情谊。柯林斯例句The bitter split which has developed within Solidarity is likely to harden further into separation.团结工会内部已产生的不愉快分歧可能会进一步演变为分裂。柯林斯例句收起实用场景例句真题例句全部六级考研Nick Perks, project director for Climate Solidarity, believes this sort of activity is where the future of environmental action lies.出自-2015年12月阅读原文A retired member of the Public and Commercial Services Union, she is setting up one of 1,100 action groups with the support of Climate Solidarity, a two-year environmental campaign aimed at trade unionists.出自-2015年12月阅读原文nick Perks, project director for Climate Solidarity, believes this sort of activity is where the future of environmental action lies.2015年12月六级真题（第二套）阅读 Section BDurkheim proposed that religious beliefs functioned to reinforce social solidarity.出自-2009年考研阅读原文收起真题例句英英释义Noun1. a union of interests or purposes or sympathies among members of a group收起英英释义词根词缀词根: solid表示"巩固,团结"adj.solid 固体的, 实心的solid巩固,团结→n.固体, 立体 adj.固体的, 实心的solidary 团结一致的,休戚相关的solid巩固,团结+ary表形容词→adj.团结一致的,休戚相关的n.solid 固体, 立体 solid巩固,团结→n.固体, 立体 adj.固体的, 实心的solidarity 团结solidary[adj.团结一致的,休戚相关的]+ity表名词→solidarity团结v.solidify [使]凝固,[使]团结, 巩固solid巩固,团结+ify表动词→v.[使]凝固,[使]团结, 巩固同义词n.稳固,坚定,可靠,能力,力量,完整,完全powerfirmnesswholenessentiretysoundnesstotalitycompletenessintegritystabilitytrustworthinessreliabilitystrengthn.赞同,协调,一致,共同关心,团体精神concordunionfeelingteamlike-mindednessconsensusinunanimitynumbersstrengthfellowshipaccordconcordancespiritaccordanceharmonyfellowconsentaneityonenessconcurrencesingle-mindednessunity行业词典医学互助对有限的卫生资源进行公平而合理的配置时的道德原则 释义词态变化实用场景例句真题例句英英释义词根词缀同义词行SOLIDARITY中文(繁體)翻譯：劍橋詞典
SOLIDARITY中文(繁體)翻譯：劍橋詞典
詞典
翻譯
文法
同義詞詞典
+Plus
劍橋詞典+Plus
Shop
劍橋詞典+Plus
我的主頁
+Plus 幫助
退出
劍橋詞典+Plus
我的主頁
+Plus 幫助
退出
登錄
/
註冊
正體中文 (繁體)
查找
查找
英語-中文（繁體）
solidarity 在英語-中文（繁體）詞典中的翻譯
solidaritynoun [ U ] uk
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɒl.ɪˈdær.ə.ti/ us
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɑː.lɪˈder.ə.t̬i/
Add to word list
Add to word list
C1 agreement between and support for the members of a group, especially a political group
團結一致
The situation raises important questions about solidarity among member states of the UN.
當前形勢對聯合國成員國能否團結一致這一重要問題提出了質疑。
The purpose of the speech was to show solidarity with the country's leaders.
這場演講的目的是為了表示與國家領導人團結一致。
(solidarity在劍橋英語-中文（繁體）詞典的翻譯 © Cambridge University Press)
solidarity的例句
solidarity
A positive politeness strategy highlights involvement, solidarity, and common membership, which are the essence of intimacy.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
Prebendalism is essentially a system of shared identity and social solidarity expressing itself through a circuit which concentrates and redistributes income.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
They then use this model in crafting their solidarity activities and in dispensing resources.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
Religious solidarity and national identity are thus forced into exclusive paradigms, which do not recognise the different narratives within each ideology.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
As the structural dimension of solidarity had not strengthened, it was not surprising that the third hypotheses also had to be rejected.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
The relationship will not always exclude maintenance of traditional clientelistic ties or ethnic solidarity.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
The motivation is more to do with protecting the inherited connection between social solidarity and national sovereignty.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
Each individual is integrated into various networks, each of which entails solidarities and therefore corresponding pressures.
來自 Cambridge English Corpus
示例中的觀點不代表劍橋詞典編輯、劍橋大學出版社和其許可證頒發者的觀點。
C1
solidarity的翻譯
中文（簡體）
团结一致…
查看更多內容
西班牙語
solidaridad…
查看更多內容
葡萄牙語
solidariedade…
查看更多內容
更多語言
in Marathi
土耳其語
法語
in Dutch
in Tamil
in Hindi
in Gujarati
丹麥語
in Swedish
馬來西亞語
德語
挪威語
in Urdu
in Ukrainian
俄語
in Telugu
in Bengali
捷克語
印尼語
泰語
越南語
波蘭語
एकजूट, गटाच्या सदस्यांमधील करार आणि समर्थन, विशेषत: राजकीय गट…
查看更多內容
dayanışma, birlik, yekvücut olma…
查看更多內容
solidarité…
查看更多內容
solidariteit…
查看更多內容
ஒரு குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு, குறிப்பாக ஒரு அரசியல் குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு இடையே உடன்பாடு மற்றும் ஆதரவு…
查看更多內容
(प्रायः राजनीतिक) एकजुटता…
查看更多內容
એકતા, ઐક્ય…
查看更多內容
solidaritet…
查看更多內容
solidaritet, samhörighetskänsla…
查看更多內容
perpaduan…
查看更多內容
der Zusammenhalt…
查看更多內容
solidaritet, fellesskapsfølelse…
查看更多內容
یکجہتی, ہم آہنگی…
查看更多內容
солідарність, згуртованість…
查看更多內容
солидарность…
查看更多內容
సమూహానికి, ముఖ్యంగా రాజకీయ సమూహానికి చెందిన సభ్యుల మధ్య ఒప్పందం, ఒకరికొకరి మద్దతు…
查看更多內容
সংহতি…
查看更多內容
soudržnost…
查看更多內容
solidaritas…
查看更多內容
ความสามัคคี…
查看更多內容
tình đoàn kết…
查看更多內容
solidarność…
查看更多內容
需要一個翻譯器嗎？
獲得快速、免費的翻譯！
翻譯器工具
solidarity的發音是什麼？
在英語詞典中查看 solidarity 的釋義
瀏覽
solid
solid fuel
solid-state
solid-state drive
solidarity
solidification
solidify
solidity
solidly
「每日一詞」
flexitarian
A flexitarian way of eating consists mainly of vegetarian food but with some meat.
關於這個
部落格
Forget doing it or forget to do it? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (2)
March 06, 2024
查看更多
新詞
stochastic parrot
March 04, 2024
查看更多
已添加至 list
回到頁面頂端
內容
英語-中文（繁體）例句翻譯
©劍橋大學出版社與評估2024
學習
學習
學習
新詞
幫助
紙本出版
Word of the Year 2021
Word of the Year 2022
Word of the Year 2023
開發
開發
開發
詞典API
連按兩下查看
搜尋Widgets
執照資料
關於
關於
關於
無障礙閱讀
劍橋英語教學
劍橋大學出版社與評估
授權管理
Cookies與隱私保護
語料庫
使用條款
京ICP备14002226号-2
©劍橋大學出版社與評估2024
劍橋詞典+Plus
我的主頁
+Plus 幫助
退出
詞典
定義
清晰解釋自然的書面和口頭英語
英語
學習詞典
基礎英式英語
基礎美式英語
翻譯
點選箭頭改變翻譯方向。
雙語詞典
英語-中文（簡體）
Chinese (Simplified)–English
英語-中文（繁體）
Chinese (Traditional)–English
英語-荷蘭文
荷蘭語-英語
英語-法語
法語-英語
英語-德語
德語-英語
英語-印尼語
印尼語-英語
英語-義大利語
義大利語-英語
英語-日語
日語-英語
英語-挪威語
挪威語-英語
英語-波蘭語
波蘭語-英語
英語-葡萄牙語
葡萄牙語-英語
英語-西班牙語
西班牙語-英語
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
半雙語詞典
英語-阿拉伯語
英語-孟加拉文
英語-加泰羅尼亞語
英語-捷克語
英語-丹麥語
English–Gujarati
英語-印地語
英語-韓語
英語-馬來語
英語-馬拉地語
英語-俄語
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
英語-泰語
英語-土耳其語
英語-烏克蘭文
English–Urdu
英語-越南語
翻譯
文法
同義詞詞典
Pronunciation
劍橋詞典+Plus
Shop
劍橋詞典+Plus
我的主頁
+Plus 幫助
退出
登錄 /
註冊
正體中文 (繁體)
Change
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
中文 (简体)
正體中文 (繁體)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
हिंदी
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
關注我們！
選擇一本詞典
最近的詞和建議
定義
清晰解釋自然的書面和口頭英語
英語
學習詞典
基礎英式英語
基礎美式英語
文法與同義詞詞典
對自然書面和口頭英語用法的解釋
英語文法
同義詞詞典
Pronunciation
British and American pronunciations with audio
English Pronunciation
翻譯
點選箭頭改變翻譯方向。
雙語詞典
英語-中文（簡體）
Chinese (Simplified)–English
英語-中文（繁體）
Chinese (Traditional)–English
英語-荷蘭文
荷蘭語-英語
英語-法語
法語-英語
英語-德語
德語-英語
英語-印尼語
印尼語-英語
英語-義大利語
義大利語-英語
英語-日語
日語-英語
英語-挪威語
挪威語-英語
英語-波蘭語
波蘭語-英語
英語-葡萄牙語
葡萄牙語-英語
英語-西班牙語
西班牙語-英語
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
半雙語詞典
英語-阿拉伯語
英語-孟加拉文
英語-加泰羅尼亞語
英語-捷克語
英語-丹麥語
English–Gujarati
英語-印地語
英語-韓語
英語-馬來語
英語-馬拉地語
英語-俄語
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
英語-泰語
英語-土耳其語
英語-烏克蘭文
English–Urdu
英語-越南語
詞典+Plus
詞彙表
選擇語言
正體中文 (繁體)
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
中文 (简体)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
हिंदी
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
內容
英語-中文（繁體）
Noun
例句
Translations
文法
所有翻譯
我的詞彙表
把solidarity添加到下面的一個詞彙表中，或者創建一個新詞彙表。
更多詞彙表
前往詞彙表
對該例句有想法嗎？
例句中的單詞與輸入詞條不匹配。
該例句含有令人反感的內容。
取消
提交
例句中的單詞與輸入詞條不匹配。
該例句含有令人反感的內容。
取消
提交
SOLIDARITY | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
SOLIDARITY | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary
Dictionary
Translate
Grammar
Thesaurus
+Plus
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
Shop
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
My profile
+Plus help
Log out
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
My profile
+Plus help
Log out
Log in
/
Sign up
English (UK)
Search
Search
English
Meaning of solidarity in English
solidaritynoun [ U ] uk
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɒl.ɪˈdær.ə.ti/ us
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɑː.lɪˈder.ə.t̬i/
Add to word list
Add to word list
C1 agreement between and support for the members of a group, especially a political group: The situation raises important questions about solidarity among member states of the UN. The purpose of the speech was to show solidarity with the country's leaders.
Thesaurus: synonyms, antonyms, and examples
the state of agreeing with someone or somethingagreementThere's widespread agreement that something must be done.acceptanceHis views never gained acceptance among the broader community.concordanceThe study shows strong concordance between patient health and patient happiness. assentThe bill received royal assent.consentI give my consent to the marriage.sanctionShe gave official state sanction to the drilling company for their proposed pipeline.
See more results »
SMART Vocabulary: related words and phrases
Accepting & agreeing
acceptance
accepting
accommodation
accreditation
agree to something
agree with something
assent
compact
currency
presumed consent
ratification
re-establish
regrant
revalidate
rise to the bait idiom
root
rule
signatory
unquestioning
without a murmur idiom
See more results »
(Definition of solidarity from the Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus © Cambridge University Press)
solidarity | American Dictionary
solidaritynoun [ U ] us
Your browser doesn't support HTML5 audio
/ˌsɑl·əˈdær·ɪ·t̬i/
Add to word list
Add to word list
agreement between and support for the members of a group: Hundreds of supporters gathered to show solidarity for the three men.
world history
(also Solidarity) Solidarity is the name of a trade union (= an organization of workers) in Poland that began in 1980 and that was important in establishing free elections in 1989
(Definition of solidarity from the Cambridge Academic Content Dictionary © Cambridge University Press)
Examples of solidarity
solidarity
The latter response is reinforced in us by our obligation to stand in solidarity with victims of wrongdoing against those who have wronged them.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
As the structural dimension of solidarity had not strengthened, it was not surprising that the third hypotheses also had to be rejected.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
In terms of solidarity, the free rider has two options.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
In the absence of powerful dissenting voices, they have even been able to present this as a form of solidarity with the 'socially excluded'.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Religious solidarity and national identity are thus forced into exclusive paradigms, which do not recognise the different narratives within each ideology.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
A positive politeness strategy highlights involvement, solidarity, and common membership, which are the essence of intimacy.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The relationship will not always exclude maintenance of traditional clientelistic ties or ethnic solidarity.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
The motivation is more to do with protecting the inherited connection between social solidarity and national sovereignty.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
However, future studies offer the potential to compare the effects of, for example, civic duty, neighbourhood solidarity and close election messages.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
In reality, a great number of households depend on both a good monetary income and a functional solidarity system inside and outside the home.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Prebendalism is essentially a system of shared identity and social solidarity expressing itself through a circuit which concentrates and redistributes income.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
It is perhaps in some forms of cognitive speech that the individual exhibits his solidarity both corporeal and psychical at its highest.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
They then use this model in crafting their solidarity activities and in dispensing resources.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
Each individual is integrated into various networks, each of which entails solidarities and therefore corresponding pressures.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
To this end, their chief concern was to safeguard access both to the mechanisms of traditional solidarity and to the means and factors of production.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.
Collocations with solidarity
solidarity
These are words often used in combination with solidarity.Click on a collocation to see more examples of it.
act of solidarityIn turn, newspapers and government propaganda framed assistance to refugees as an act of solidarity and brotherhood which helped to strengthen the country's resolve and reconstruct national identity.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
expression of solidarityAnd it is exactly revealing of the formation of a village identity emerging during the expression of solidarity over asserting village limits.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
feeling of solidarityThis prompts a feeling of solidarity.
From the Cambridge English Corpus
These examples are from corpora and from sources on the web. Any opinions in the examples do not represent the opinion of the Cambridge Dictionary editors or of Cambridge University Press or its licensors.
See all collocations with solidarity
What is the pronunciation of solidarity?
C1
Translations of solidarity
in Chinese (Traditional)
團結一致…
See more
in Chinese (Simplified)
团结一致…
See more
in Spanish
solidaridad…
See more
in Portuguese
solidariedade…
See more
in more languages
in Marathi
in Turkish
in French
in Dutch
in Tamil
in Hindi
in Gujarati
in Danish
in Swedish
in Malay
in German
in Norwegian
in Urdu
in Ukrainian
in Russian
in Telugu
in Bengali
in Czech
in Indonesian
in Thai
in Vietnamese
in Polish
एकजूट, गटाच्या सदस्यांमधील करार आणि समर्थन, विशेषत: राजकीय गट…
See more
dayanışma, birlik, yekvücut olma…
See more
solidarité…
See more
solidariteit…
See more
ஒரு குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு, குறிப்பாக ஒரு அரசியல் குழுவின் உறுப்பினர்களுக்கு இடையே உடன்பாடு மற்றும் ஆதரவு…
See more
(प्रायः राजनीतिक) एकजुटता…
See more
એકતા, ઐક્ય…
See more
solidaritet…
See more
solidaritet, samhörighetskänsla…
See more
perpaduan…
See more
der Zusammenhalt…
See more
solidaritet, fellesskapsfølelse…
See more
یکجہتی, ہم آہنگی…
See more
солідарність, згуртованість…
See more
солидарность…
See more
సమూహానికి, ముఖ్యంగా రాజకీయ సమూహానికి చెందిన సభ్యుల మధ్య ఒప్పందం, ఒకరికొకరి మద్దతు…
See more
সংহতি…
See more
soudržnost…
See more
solidaritas…
See more
ความสามัคคี…
See more
tình đoàn kết…
See more
solidarność…
See more
Need a translator?
Get a quick, free translation!
Translator tool
Browse
solid rocket
BETA
solid-state
solid-state drive
solid-state physics
BETA
solidarity
solidi
solidification
solidified
solidify
Word of the Day
flexitarian
A flexitarian way of eating consists mainly of vegetarian food but with some meat.
About this
Blog
Forget doing it or forget to do it? Avoiding common mistakes with verb patterns (2)
March 06, 2024
Read More
New Words
stochastic parrot
March 04, 2024
More new words
has been added to list
To top
Contents
EnglishAmericanExamplesCollocationsTranslations
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024
Learn
Learn
Learn
New Words
Help
In Print
Word of the Year 2021
Word of the Year 2022
Word of the Year 2023
Develop
Develop
Develop
Dictionary API
Double-Click Lookup
Search Widgets
License Data
About
About
About
Accessibility
Cambridge English
Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Consent Management
Cookies and Privacy
Corpus
Terms of Use
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
My profile
+Plus help
Log out
Dictionary
Definitions
Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English
English
Learner’s Dictionary
Essential British English
Essential American English
Translations
Click on the arrows to change the translation direction.
Bilingual Dictionaries
English–Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Simplified)–English
English–Chinese (Traditional)
Chinese (Traditional)–English
English–Dutch
Dutch–English
English–French
French–English
English–German
German–English
English–Indonesian
Indonesian–English
English–Italian
Italian–English
English–Japanese
Japanese–English
English–Norwegian
Norwegian–English
English–Polish
Polish–English
English–Portuguese
Portuguese–English
English–Spanish
Spanish–English
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
Semi-bilingual Dictionaries
English–Arabic
English–Bengali
English–Catalan
English–Czech
English–Danish
English–Gujarati
English–Hindi
English–Korean
English–Malay
English–Marathi
English–Russian
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
English–Thai
English–Turkish
English–Ukrainian
English–Urdu
English–Vietnamese
Translate
Grammar
Thesaurus
Pronunciation
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
Shop
Cambridge Dictionary +Plus
My profile
+Plus help
Log out
Log in /
Sign up
English (UK)
Change
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
中文 (简体)
正體中文 (繁體)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
Nederlands
Svenska
Dansk
Norsk
हिंदी
বাঙ্গালি
मराठी
ગુજરાતી
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
Українська
Follow us
Choose a dictionary
Recent and Recommended
Definitions
Clear explanations of natural written and spoken English
English
Learner’s Dictionary
Essential British English
Essential American English
Grammar and thesaurus
Usage explanations of natural written and spoken English
Grammar
Thesaurus
Pronunciation
British and American pronunciations with audio
English Pronunciation
Translation
Click on the arrows to change the translation direction.
Bilingual Dictionaries
English–Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Simplified)–English
English–Chinese (Traditional)
Chinese (Traditional)–English
English–Dutch
Dutch–English
English–French
French–English
English–German
German–English
English–Indonesian
Indonesian–English
English–Italian
Italian–English
English–Japanese
Japanese–English
English–Norwegian
Norwegian–English
English–Polish
Polish–English
English–Portuguese
Portuguese–English
English–Spanish
Spanish–English
English–Swedish
Swedish–English
Semi-bilingual Dictionaries
English–Arabic
English–Bengali
English–Catalan
English–Czech
English–Danish
English–Gujarati
English–Hindi
English–Korean
English–Malay
English–Marathi
English–Russian
English–Tamil
English–Telugu
English–Thai
English–Turkish
English–Ukrainian
English–Urdu
English–Vietnamese
Dictionary +Plus
Word Lists
Choose your language
English (UK)
English (US)
Español
Русский
Português
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
中文 (简体)
正體中文 (繁體)
Polski
한국어
Türkçe
日本語
Tiếng Việt
Nederlands
Svenska
Dansk
Norsk
हिंदी
বাঙ্গালি
मराठी
ગુજરાતી
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
Українська
Contents
English
Noun
American
Noun
Examples
Collocations
Translations
Grammar
All translations
My word lists
Add solidarity to one of your lists below, or create a new one.
More
Go to your word lists
Tell us about this example sentence:
The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word.
The sentence contains offensive content.
Cancel
Submit
The word in the example sentence does not match the entry word.
The sentence contains offensive content.
Cancel
Submit
Solidarity Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Solidarity Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
Menu Toggle
Merriam-Webster Logo
Games & Quizzes
Games & Quizzes
Word of the Day
Grammar
Wordplay
Word Finder
Thesaurus
Join MWU
Shop
Books
Merch
Settings
My Words
Recents
Account
Log Out
More
Thesaurus
Join MWU
Shop
Books
Merch
Log In
Username
My Words
Recents
Account
Log Out
Est. 1828
Dictionary
Definition
Definition
Example Sentences
Word History
Related Articles
Entries Near
Cite this EntryCitation
Share
Kids DefinitionKids
Legal DefinitionLegal
More from M-W
Show more
Show more
Citation
Share
Kids
Legal
More from M-W
Save Word
To save this word, you'll need to log in.
Log In
solidarity
noun
sol·i·dar·i·ty
ˌsä-lə-ˈder-ə-tē
-ˈda-rə-
Synonyms of solidarity
: unity (as of a group or class) that produces or is based on community of interests, objectives, and standards
Examples of solidarity in a Sentence
The vote was a show of solidarity.
Recent Examples on the Web
The Houthis, who control much of Yemen including the capital Sanaa, have said their attacks off the coast of Yemen are a show of solidarity for Palestinians facing Israeli attacks in Gaza.
—Emma Bowman, NPR, 24 Feb. 2024
And in a rare display of solidarity, many of the jurors who had taken just over two hours to convict Walton, re-entered the courtroom to hear the family speak and listen to the sentencing.
—Charles Rabin, Miami Herald, 22 Feb. 2024
In solidarity, Sam’s teammates boycott the sponsor alongside him on the field, covering up the company logo on their jerseys.
—Melissa Jun Rowley, Rolling Stone, 22 Feb. 2024
Last fall, it was reported that the White House had circulated a somber, confidential analysis that solidarity for Ukraine among allies might crumble without additional concrete steps being taken to stem the perception of corruption that still bedevils the country.
—James P. Moore Jr., Fortune Europe, 22 Feb. 2024
The judge ruled then that it was not protected because employees were showing solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement, without any goal related to their working conditions at the store.
—Ramishah Maruf, CNN, 21 Feb. 2024
People who wore masks and people who did not weren’t simply members of different clans: the ones with masks were making a gesture toward social solidarity and signalling a reluctance to infect their neighbors; the ones without were affirming selfishness as a principle of conduct.
—Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker, 19 Feb. 2024
Both candidates expressed unwavering support for Israel in its conflict with Hamas, even appearing side-by-side in an unusual joint event intended to convey solidarity.
—Anthony Izaguirre, Fortune, 14 Feb. 2024
So here, the consensus model leads to social solidarity wherein collective conscience operates as a unifying force within the society.
—Sindhu Bhaskar, Forbes, 13 Feb. 2024
See More
These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'solidarity.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.
Word History
Etymology
French solidarité, from solidaire characterized by solidarity, from Latin solidum whole sum, from neuter of solidus solid
First Known Use
1841, in the meaning defined above
Time Traveler
The first known use of solidarity was
in 1841
See more words from the same year
Articles Related to solidarity
The Words of the Week - 6/12/20
Some of the words that defined the week ending June 12, 2020
Dictionary Entries Near solidarity
solidarism
solidarity
solidarize
See More Nearby Entries
Cite this Entry
Style
MLA
Chicago
APA
Merriam-Webster
“Solidarity.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/solidarity. Accessed 9 Mar. 2024.
Copy Citation
Share
Post the Definition of solidarity to Facebook
Share the Definition of solidarity on Twitter
Kids Definition
solidarity
noun
sol·i·dar·i·ty
ˌsäl-ə-ˈdar-ət-ē
: unity (as of a group) that produces or is based on shared interests and goals
Legal Definition
solidarity
noun
sol·i·dar·i·ty
ˌsä-lə-ˈdar-ə-tē
in the civil law of Louisiana
: the quality or state of being solidary : existence of a solidary obligation
will not presume solidarity
More from Merriam-Webster on solidarity
Thesaurus: All synonyms and antonyms for solidarity
Nglish: Translation of solidarity for Spanish Speakers
Britannica English: Translation of solidarity for Arabic Speakers
Britannica.com: Encyclopedia article about solidarity
Last Updated:
28 Feb 2024
- Updated example sentences
Love words? Need even more definitions?
Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!
Merriam-Webster unabridged
Can you solve 4 words at once?
Play
Play
Can you solve 4 words at once?
Play
Play
Word of the Day
germane
See Definitions and Examples »
Get Word of the Day daily email!
Popular in Grammar & Usage
See All
8 Grammar Terms You Used to Know, But Forgot
Homophones, Homographs, and Homonyms
Your vs. You're: How to Use Them Correctly
Every Letter Is Silent, Sometimes: A-Z List of Examples
More Commonly Mispronounced Words
See All
Popular in Wordplay
See All
10 Lesser-Known Reduplications
The Words of the Week - Mar. 8
10 Scrabble Words Without Any Vowels
12 More Bird Names that Sound Like Insults (and Sometimes Are)
8 Uncommon Words Related to Love
See All
Games & Quizzes
See All
Quordle
Can you solve 4 words at once?
Play
Blossom Word Game
You can make only 12 words. Pick the best ones!
Play
Missing Letter
A crossword with a twist
Play
Spelling Bee Quiz
Can you outdo past winners of the National Spelli...
Take the quiz
Merriam Webster
Learn a new word every day. Delivered to your inbox!
Help
About Us
Advertising Info
Contact Us
Diversity
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
YouTube
© 2024 Merriam-Webster, Incorporated
Just a moment...
a moment...Enable JavaScript and cookies to continueSolidarity in Social and Political Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Solidarity in Social and Political Philosophy (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Menu
Browse
Table of Contents
What's New
Random Entry
Chronological
Archives
About
Editorial Information
About the SEP
Editorial Board
How to Cite the SEP
Special Characters
Advanced Tools
Contact
Support SEP
Support the SEP
PDFs for SEP Friends
Make a Donation
SEPIA for Libraries
Entry Navigation
Entry Contents
Bibliography
Academic Tools
Friends PDF Preview
Author and Citation Info
Back to Top
Solidarity in Social and Political PhilosophyFirst published Sat Mar 25, 2023
The term “solidarity” first becomes prevalent in the
early- to late-nineteenth century in France. Since then, it has always
been used to describe a special relationship of unity and mutual
indebtedness within a group. The term’s origins lie in French
legal usage, in which the Roman legal concept of an obligation in
solidum—a joint contractual obligation in which each
signatory declared himself liable for the debts of all
together—long had a place in the French code civile
(Blais 2007; Hayward 1959; Wildt 1999). Solidarity expands beyond its
legal origins to become a central social and political concept in
response to anxiety about the centrifugal, individualizing forces of
commercial and industrial society. What could replace the old social
ties of church, family, and guild, all of which had been weakened by
markets? What might ensure a sense of shared purpose and common good?
As an answer to these questions, “solidarity” becomes a
rallying cry in progressive movements across Europe, including
socialism, liberal nationalism, Catholic reformism, and
Solidarism.
More recently, there has been a resurgence not only in calls for
solidarity but also in theorizing about solidarity. Solidarity has
been invoked with increasing regularity in contemporary social
movements (Movement for Black Lives, Occupy, MeToo, climate change
activism), law and politics (COVID, EU, constitutions around the
world, human rights), and even bioethics. There is a growing
literature in sociology, political science, social theory, and social
and political philosophy on the concept and its value. And yet, the
idea remains hard to pin down: What is solidarity? And what, if
anything, makes it valuable? In this entry, we aim to provide an
overview of this recent debate, focusing on its development in social
and political philosophy.
1. The Nature of Solidarity
2. Solidarity in Practice
2.1 Socialism
2.2 Civic Solidarity
2.3 National Solidarity
2.4 Christian Solidarity
2.5 Solidarity in social movements
2.6 Conclusion
3. The Value of Solidarity
4. Challenges to Solidarity
4.1 Theoretical criticism of solidarity
4.1.1 Conceptual incoherence
4.1.2 Theoretical redundancy
4.2 Practical challenges to Solidarity
4.2.1 Does solidarity threaten liberty?
4.2.2 Does solidarity promote false beliefs?
4.2.3 Is solidarity exclusionary / unfair towards outsiders?
Bibliography
Academic Tools
Other Internet Resources
Related Entries
1. The Nature of Solidarity
In social and political philosophy, the concept of solidarity is
primarily used to evaluate, guide, and describe activities within
groups and between individuals and groups. In unpacking different
accounts, it is useful to begin by listing some typical
practice-embedded expressions in which the concept is used. In a
conversation about our work environment, someone might say, “we
should show more solidarity with one another”; in a conversation
about the origins of the welfare state, someone might say, “the
welfare state is an expression of solidarity among citizens”; in
a conversation about the dynamics of social movements, someone might
say, “the neo-Nazi protesters acted in solidarity with one
another”; in a conversation about supporting the Movement for
Black Lives (M4BL), someone might say, “I stand in solidarity
with you in fighting oppression”; in a conversation about the
moral values animating European integration as a project, someone
might say, “solidarity is a foundational value of the European
Union”; in a conversation about the downsides of investment
banking, someone might say, “there is not much solidarity among
bankers”; in a conversation about the plight of earthquake
victims in Indonesia, someone might say, “solidarity requires
that we send some money as soon as possible”; in responding to
news that a teammate has cancer, someone might say: “we ought to
shave our heads in solidarity”. What accounts of the concept can
aid us in evaluating and describing the phenomenon referred to in
these and similar circumstances?
At the broadest level, philosophers (such as O’Neill 1996: 201
and Miller 2017: 62) usually distinguish between two senses of
solidarity: solidarity among and solidarity with.
According to the former, solidarity describes a relation among members
of the same social group. As we will see in more detail below,
solidarity among usually requires a rough symmetry in the
attitudes and dispositions of its members. For example, we might both
identify as members of Danish nation, share a commitment to overthrow
the occupiers, and each be willing to come to each other’s aid
in fighting them. On the other hand, solidarity with
describes a relation between an individual and another individual, or
between a set of individuals and the members of a social group of
which the former are not members (the “outgroup”). On this
reading, symmetry is not required: I might act in solidarity with you
as an earthquake victim when I wire money to an NGO that is operative
in your city. Here I act in solidarity with you without your acting in
solidarity with me (or even being disposed to act in solidarity with
me were the tables to be turned). A paradigmatic example of
solidarity with is the Catholic notion of solidarity
understood as a form of caritas, or charity (on an
alternative interpretation of solidarity in the Catholic tradition,
see below). As Józef Tischner, who was influential in
Poland’s solidarity movement, writes:
With whom, therefore, is our solidarity? It is, above all, with those
who have been wounded by other people, with those who suffer pain that
could be avoided—accidental, needless pain. This does not
preclude solidarity with others, with all who suffer. However, the
solidarity with those who suffer at the hands of others is
particularly vital, strong, spontaneous. (Tischner 1982 [1984]:
8–9)
Philosophers divide on whether asymmetric, unilateral forms of aid and
support from individuals to other individuals, or from outgroup
members to ingroups counts as genuine solidarity. For some
(see, e.g., Sangiovanni forthcoming), they do not. We do better, he
argues, not to conceive of solidarity with as a form of
solidarity at all. The unilateral, asymmetric reading, he argues,
tends to vitiate the egalitarianism at the heart of solidarity, and
does not fit well with the practices in which the term was,
historically, most prevalent. He also argues that solidarity
with in this narrower sense is not distinguishable from other,
related terms, such as “humanitarian aid”,
“charity”, “benevolence”, or “support
for a good cause”. There is nothing gained in calling forms of
humanitarian aid or support for a good cause “solidarity”,
and running the two ideas together under a single banner tends to
obscure the value of solidarity as a form of egalitarian collective
action.
For other philosophers (e.g., Kolers 2016), solidarity (whether
with or among) must always be unilateral
and asymmetric. Kolers argues that paradigmatic cases of solidarity
involve one group or individual (usually members of an outgroup),
S, deferring to an object group, G, but not
vice versa. According to Kolers,
[solidary action] is not principally justified by appeal to goals, nor
do we choose sides on the basis of shared goals. To the contrary, when
S is in solidarity with G, it is G, not
G’s ends, that S endorses or values. S is
disposed to adopt whatever goal G sets for the action
or as a political aim. For instance, insofar as they are in
solidarity, heterosexual persons who support the right of same-sex
couples to marry do so not because they individually want same-sex
marriages to be possible, but because the LGBTQ community treats that
as an important goal. (Kolers 2016: 58)
Paradigmatic instances of solidarity involve members of (out)groups
(e.g., heterosexuals) committing themselves to do whatever members of
a disadvantaged (in)group (e.g., homosexuals) require to overcome
injustice. Importantly, on this picture outgroup members commit to the
group, rather than to any aim pursued by the group. As a
heterosexual, I do not act in solidarity by committing
directly to fighting heterosexism alongside members of the LGBTQ
community; rather, to act in solidarity, I must commit to the LGBTQ
community as such, and so to whatever members tell me I need to do to
promote their cause, whatever cause that is.
One advantage of this view is that it captures an important ethical
aspect of coalitional social movements in which more privileged
(out)groups act as allies of less privileged (in)groups in fighting
injustice. As has often been noted, the trouble with such coalitions
is that members of privileged groups often tend to be blind to the way
in which privilege colors and sometimes distorts their efforts to
support the aims of the
movement.[1]
Outgroup allies can sometimes reproduce, unconsciously, wider
structural patterns of power and exclusion as they fight alongside
ingroup members; they can perpetrate, for example, forms of epistemic
injustice in seeking to impose their own agenda or ideals onto the
wider movement (Deveaux 2021; Clark 2014; Medina 2013; Gould 2020;
Land 2015). Kolers’ work reminds his readers that genuine
solidarity requires that members of outgroups put aside their
particular concerns, ideals, prejudices, and so on, and
listen (Kolers 2016: 115). They must be prepared, in turn, to
accept their relative epistemic limitations vis-à-vis members
of ingroups who not only have “skin in the game” but often
a vivid lived experience of the forms of injustice they are fighting.
And they must also be prepared to defer out of respect for the
disadvantaged: whether or not the disadvantaged have better epistemic
access to truths about the struggle, etc., the privileged ought to
defer out of respect for what is at stake for the
disadvantaged.[2]
So far, we have discussed unilateral, asymmetric accounts of our
target concept. We now turn to accounts of the concept that treat the
idea of solidarity among as paradigmatic. Rather than naming
the set of attitudes and actions characteristic of an individual who
(unilaterally) offers support or aid, the idea of solidarity
among names a relation among members of the
same group. The relation is generally understood to make it
the case that the group exhibits a distinctive kind of unity
among its members (solidus in Latin means whole or
integrated). But what kind of unity? The unity in question is
composed, on all plausible views, by an interlocking set of attitudes,
dispositions, and characteristic actions displayed by members. It is
useful to compare relations of solidarity to the relations
constituting social groups as such. According to one
influential definition of a social group, a social group
is a collection of individuals who perceive themselves to be members
of the same social category, share some emotional involvement in this
common definition of themselves, and achieve some degree of social
consensus about the evaluation of their group and their membership of
it. (Tajfel & Turner 2001: 100).
People waiting at a bus stop, or boarding a train, are not, in normal
circumstances, a social group; employees of Google and members of the
Church of England are. We can then say: For an (in)group to display
solidarity, it must recognize itself as a social group: members must
identify themselves based on some characteristic that marks them out
as a social group. For example, members might identify as
workers (on the basis, that is, of a role), as black
(on the basis of racial
categorization[3]),
as cancer survivors (on the basis of a common set of
experiences), as environmentalists (on the basis of a shared
cause), and so
on.[4]
But what other conditions are necessary (or at least paradigmatic)?
Identifying as a social group is not sufficient: it seems clear that
we might identify as employees of Google, or as engineers, or as
investment bankers, but not be in solidarity with one another.
An obvious candidate is the condition that members of the social group
be disposed to put aside narrow self-interest in coming to each
other’s aid when required. We might imagine, for example, that
the employees of Google or investment bankers are not prepared to set
aside narrow self-interest except in special circumstances (where,
say, employees know one another independently). If this were true,
then it seems clear that, in their normal everyday interactions, they
wouldn’t be in solidarity with one another (despite their
cooperation). Some philosophers believe that these two
conditions—identifying as a member of a social group and a
willingness, on that basis, to set aside narrow self-interest in
coming to a fellow’s aid—are necessary and
sufficient for solidarity. Philippe Van Parijs, for example,
writes:
When I help you out of solidarity, I do so because you are “one
of us”, because “I could have been you”, because, in
this sense, I “identify” with you. (Van Parijs
forthcoming; see also Mason 2000: 27)
To illustrate, Van Parijs gives the example of a fellow traveler
returning a lost wallet, or a cyclist helping another to board a
train. In both cases, someone identifies as a traveler (or as a
cyclist) and, in virtue of that identification, is disposed to come to
another traveler or cyclist’s aid.
An advantage of the view is that it can encompass a wide variety of
different contexts. It can, for example, account for
unilateral senses of solidarity, such as the Good Samaritan.
As long as the Good Samaritan is motivated by a relevant
self-categorization that includes the stranger, then his coming to his
aid counts as solidarity. The Good Samaritan might feel disposed to
aid because he has shared the experience of being a victim of
injustice, or because of their shared vulnerability, say, as human
beings. But its encompassing nature may also make it hard to
distinguish from related notions. The account seems to collapse into
the view that solidarity is another name for all responsibilities that
flow (or that are perceived to flow) from membership in a social
group.
Tommie Shelby offers a view that is broadly similar in structure, but
strengthens the requirements for mutual identification and group
cohesion. For Shelby,
I believe there are five core normative requirements that are jointly
sufficient for a robust form of solidarity [identification with the
group, special concern, shared values or goals, loyalty, and mutual
trust]. By “robust” I mean a solidarity that is strong
enough to move people to collective action, not just mutual sympathy
born of recognition of communality or a mere sense of group belonging.
(Shelby 2005: 68; see also May 1996: 44; cf. Feinberg 1973: 677)
Returning a lost wallet and the Good Samaritan, on this view, are
ruled out since they are products of a weak sense of group belonging.
One may object, however, that the view is still not restrictive
enough. For example, a reading group might exhibit all five features,
and move its participants to do things together, and yet it seems
strained to say that a reading group is in solidarity with one
another. (It is strained not so much because it doesn’t capture
the ordinary English meaning, but because it seems to jar with the
value and history of the practices in which the term has predominantly
figured, and which make sense of the role we might want an account of
solidarity to play.) It is also unclear, on this view, whether
collective action is a necessary condition of solidarity, or whether
two or more people can be in solidarity by holding the attitudes
mentioned without ever acting together in some relevant sense. Might
brothers be in solidarity by possessing all five of the listed
attitudes, though they never act together in the pursuit of any goals,
or come to each other’s aid in any way?
Sally Scholz offers a view of solidarity that is explicitly political
and oppositional. For Scholz,
Political solidarity arises in opposition to something; it is a
movement for social change that may occur at many levels of social
existence. … Natural disasters may inspire strong sentiments
and even bonds of connection, but they do not inspire political
solidarity. Political solidarity as I present it has a social justice
content or aim; it opposes injustice, oppression, tyranny, and social
vulnerabilities. (Scholz 2008: 54; see also Mohanty 2003:
7)[5]
Solidarity, on this view, is always geared toward overcoming
injustice; it is essentially political. The reading group would be
excluded, and so would be the Good Samaritan and sending money to
earthquake victims. Scholz also argues that the concept entails the
existence of positive moral obligations among participants. If
participants (for example, a white supremacist group) lack positive
obligations to aid each other in protesting racial integration
(because such a protest would be in the service of unjust ends), then
they cannot act in solidarity when they protest, come to each
other’s aid, and are committed to their cause.
Andrea Sangiovanni offers a view that is less restrictive (but more
restrictive than Shelby’s). In contrast to Scholz, he argues
that solidarity must always be aimed at overcoming adversity, but the
adversity need not be political. For example, suppose a village burns
down in a fire and residents band together to rebuild it. They are
committed to the endeavor and are ready to come to each other’s
aid. Because their endeavor is oriented toward overcoming shared
adversity it counts as solidarity. Furthermore, for Sangiovanni, the
concept solidarity is not moralized: even mafiosi can be in solidarity
with one another (despite the fact, that is, that their solidarity
will promote bad ends). Finally, solidarity, he claims, neither merely
precedes collective action (or, as Shelby argues, makes it
more likely) nor is it merely a by-product of collective
action, but is itself a form of collective action. As a kind
of action, it does not therefore name only a set of desires and
beliefs, a virtue, or a sense of fellowship with others. Rather,
solidarity is any instance of collective action that has the following
core features:
Participants identify with one another on the basis of a role,
condition, cause, set of experiences, or way of life on the basis of
which …
… they each …
…intend to do their part in overcoming some significant
adversity, X, by pursuing, together, some more proximate shared
goal, Y;
… are individually committed (i) to X and Y
and (ii) to not bypassing each other’s will in the achievement
of X and Y;
… are committed to sharing one another’s fates in
ways relevant to X and Y.
… trust one another to play their part in X and
Y, trust each other’s commitment, trust that each will
not bypass the other’s will, and trust each to share the
other’s fate.
This view faces a number of challenges as well. First, like Shelby and
Scholz, it doesn’t allow for unilateral cases of
solidarity—such as the Good Samaritan and sending money to
earthquake victims—to count as instances of solidarity since
there is no collective action in the required sense. Second, and
relatedly, it doesn’t allow for cases of “silent” or
“private” solidarity (Bommarito 2016; Zhao 2019). As a
young girl, Simone Weil gave up eating sugar because sugar had become
unavailable to soldiers at the front. It seems plausible to say that
she acted in solidarity with the soldiers. What reasons do we
have to rule such cases out? And, finally, it seems to rule out
protest movements that are organized on behalf of victims of
injustice but not with them. Imagine we organize a protest
against the French government’s closure of the refugee camps in
Calais, and suppose that the refugees there do not know of, or
otherwise take part in, our protest. Sangiovanni’s account seems
to force us to say that we, on the outside, act in solidarity with one
another but not with the refugees.
2. Solidarity in Practice
So far, we have discussed the nature of solidarity in general. In this
section, we review the social and political practices in which the
term has primarily figured. Whatever account of the general concept we
think is best should aid us in illuminating each of these contexts (by
successfully describing, evaluating, and guiding them). In the
following, however, we remain neutral between different accounts of
the general concept. Furthermore, we only cover a sample of such
contexts. There are many more practices in which solidarity has found
a place. We focus on what strike us as the historically most important
and influential ones.
2.1 Socialism
As mentioned above, the idea becomes prevalent in the early-nineteenth
century in France. The soil in which the concept first takes root is
socialism. The early socialist writers—Robert Owen
(1771–1858), Henri de Saint-Simon (1760–1825), and Charles
Fourier (1772–1837) (who Marx and Engels would later dismiss as
“utopian”) were especially influential—decried the
individualism and egoism fostered by market society (Claeys 2011). The
untethering of markets from constraints of traditional law, social
structures, and morality inevitably led, they argued, to social
conflict and the moral, economic, and cultural degradation of the
working classes. They believed that new forms of mutual aid,
cooperation, and association were needed to bring each functional unit
of the modern industrial economy together in a mutually supportive
web, and prevent the worst effects of the competitive division of
labor and the poverty it produces. In 1826, Robert Owen wrote:
There is but one mode … by which man can possess in perpetuity
all the happiness which his nature is capable of enjoying,—that
is by the union and co-operation of all for the benefit of
each. While mankind remain congregated in large cities and
towns, or live in single families apart from their species, each
having distinct and opposite interests, no substantial improvement can
be effected in the condition of society. To obtain the full advantages
of cooperation, men must be associated in small communities, or large
families, all the members of which shall be united by the bond of one
common interest; the same bond of union connecting each community with
every other established on similar principles. (Owen 1826–27
[2016: 69]; see also Leopold 2015)
Hippolyte Renaud gave this unified, mutually supportive social
cooperation in the service of each and all a name that formed the
title of his immensely popular summary of Fourier’s works,
namely Solidarité
(1842).[6]
In “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific” (1876), Engels
rejected the utopians’ for failing to explain how their proposed
societies could ever be realized (1876 [1978: 685ff]). There was no
basis for their doctrines or their faith in the empirically verifiable
laws of society. Given its association with the
“utopians”, it is revealing that neither Marx nor Engels
ever used “solidarity” as a term in any of their
systematic writings. Where they did use the term was in their speeches
and letters regarding the workingmen’s associations that were
springing up everywhere in defense of socialism. In 1872, in a speech
given in Amsterdam after a congress of the First International, Marx
says:
Citizens, let us think of the basic principle of the International:
Solidarity. Only when we have established this life-giving principle
on a sound basis among the numerous workers of all countries will we
attain the great final goal which we have set ourselves. The
revolution must be carried out with solidarity; this is the great
lesson of the French Commune, which fell because none of the other
centers—Berlin, Madrid, etc.—developed great revolutionary
movements comparable to the mighty uprising of the Paris proletariat.
(Marx 1872 [1978: 522])
And, as Karl Kautsky, one of the most influential Marxists in the late
nineteenth century, writes in the Class Struggle, which was
the German Social Democratic Party’s official commentary on the
proposed Erfurt program of 1891:
But as soon as the workers discover that their interests are common,
that they are all opposed to the exploiter, it takes the form of great
organizations and open battles against the exploiting class.…
And when [these elevating tendencies] have once wakened full
class-consciousness in any group of workers, the consciousness of
solidarity with all the members of the working-class, the
consciousness of the strength that is born of union; as soon as any
group has recognized that it is essential to society and that it dare
hope for better things in the future,—then it is well nigh
impossible to shove that group back into the degenerate mass of beings
whose opposition to the system under which they suffer takes no other
form than that of unreasoned hate. (Kautsky 1892: Ch. 5,
Secs. 5–6; see also Wildt 1999)
From its early socialist origins, “solidarity” found its
natural home as a term describing the unity of workers’
associations—a term describing, that is, their mutual
identification with one another as exploited, their mutual commitment
to overthrowing capitalism through organized cooperation, and their
willingness to sacrifice for one another in the name of the cause.
2.2 Civic Solidarity
Civic solidarity refers to solidarity among citizens of modern states,
and is often associated with the emergence and development of welfare
states. The term as used in this way first became popular in the
late-nineteenth century in France. The late-nineteenth century usages
are outgrowths of earlier forms of socialism, but they develop the
idea in directions that are less oppositional than the socialism that
emerges as a political force in the wake of 1848. Two figures are
associated with its popularization during this period: Léon
Bourgeois and Emile Durkheim. We start with Léon Bourgeois
since his account was, at the time, more influential than
Durkheim’s.
In 1896, Léon Bourgeois—prime minister of France from
1895–6—published what would become the programmatic
manifesto of the Solidarist movement, namely a pamphlet entitled
Solidarité (Bourgeois 1902). The pamphlet begins by
noting that all complex organisms reproduce themselves through an
internal division of labor. Each organ has a different function; their
interdependence is organized in such a way as to ensure the
being’s self-preservation. Bourgeois calls this internal unity
natural solidarity. He then goes on to note that societies
are organized in much the same way: the more complex a society is, the
more diverse and interdependent its internal division of labor. There
are two differences. The first difference is that societies are made
up of individuals possessed of reason and will, and so the laws of
nature are not sufficient to ensure that the parts will coordinate to
sustain and reproduce the life of the whole. The second difference
follows directly from the first. Because the coordination necessary to
maintain and reproduce a society depends on the reason and will of
individuals, the laws that govern that reproduction must also work via
those very same faculties. The laws governing social
solidarity are, therefore, necessarily moral.
What mores ought to govern the division of labor and so,
ultimately, the distribution of the benefits and burdens of joint
production (la répartition des profits et des
charges)? Bourgeois writes that we must look for an answer at the
moral implications of the very reciprocal dependence that constitutes
society in the first place. Once we do so, we will see that every
individual within the societal division of labor owes the vast
preponderance of what they are able to obtain from that
society—for example, through their talents and abilities, or
through the knowledge they acquire from that society—to two
sources. First, they owe a debt to past generations and, second, to
contemporaries who, in the present, reproduce and advance the
institutions, knowledge, resources, and societal conventions from
which they gain (almost) all that is theirs.
[Because of man’s dependence on the societal division of labor]
a necessary exchange of services exists between each and all. The free
development of his faculties, of his activities, in short, of his very
being, can only be realized, for each individual, as a result
of the concurrent contributions of other men’s faculties and
activities. This free development can, furthermore, only reach its
full extent as a result of the accumulated contributions of the
past.
There is therefore a debt owed by each to all the rest, in virtue of
the contributions and services rendered by all to each. (Bourgeois
1902: 137, translation by Sangiovanni)
Moral solidarity requires, then, citizens to identify with
one another as jointly responsible for the social product, and to be
prepared to discharge the social debt through common institutions
designed to insure people against unemployment, sickness, and old age,
to maintain jobs open to talents, and to support a public system of
education. Lack of moral solidarity, Bourgeois implies, will lead
inevitably to lack of coordination among the parts, and so to a
breakdown in natural solidarity.
Published a few years earlier than Bourgeois’ pamphlet,
Durkheim’s doctoral thesis—The Division of Labor in
Society (1893)—distinguished between the
mechanical solidarity typical of premodern, less complex
societies and the organic solidarity of modern industrialized
societies. Societies whose social cohesion is founded on mechanical
solidarity are integrated through a “collective
consciousness” that defines a common way of life. Where
mechanical solidarity is characterized by similarity among
members of a society, organic solidarity is characterized by
difference. At the heart of organic solidarity is, as it was
for Bourgeois, the division of labor. Modern societies must be
integrated via the coordinated interdependence of an extensive
division of labor. But Durkheim is adamant that the coordinated
functioning of the different parts is not self-regulating. He
emphasizes the need for a diffuse moral solidarity to
reinforce and stabilize the functioning of the division of labor.
(Top-down regulation via the state—which is “too
remote” and “general”—is also not enough
[Durkheim 1893 [1984: 27]].) This solidarity can no longer come from
the “collective consciousness” (as it did in premodern
societies): the differentiation of modern society increases
individualism and diversity, undoing the bonds of similarity that tie
together premodern societies. What sources are left to support the
mutual “attraction”, disposition to come to other’s
aid, and trust required for the cohesion of a society?
His proposed solution is clearest in the Second Preface to the
Division of Labor, added in 1902. He suggests that the state
alone cannot guarantee the conditions necessary for maintaining
solidarity against the three predominant causes of social unrest in
modern, differentiated societies. The first cause is anomie,
the loss of direction and orientation that can accompany
specialization. Anomie is the primary social danger accompanying the
growing depth and extent of the division of labor, and threatens the
sense in which we each are essential contributors to the success of
society as a whole (Durkheim 1893/1902 [1984: 289–90]). The
second cause is force, the sense of injustice that arises
from a feeling that one’s work is not valued according to its
worth and one’s own merits—the sense, in short, that one
is exploited. Such grievances are especially strong when premodern
elements of caste persist in modern conditions. The third cause is
disuse, or the aimlessness, resentment, and lack of focus
that comes from not having enough work. In each case, Durkheim argues,
the citizen comes to lose a grip on his larger place in reproducing
the whole; as he turns inwards, his grievances seem to him larger and
his duties to others less pressing; he is less fulfilled by his labor,
seeing it no longer as a reflection of his nature; mistrust takes
root; he no longer sees his potential employers as cooperative
partners, but begins to see them as enemies.
In the Preface, he argues that only the “professional grouping
is a moral force capable of curbing individual egoism” (Durkheim
1893/1902 [1984: 11]). By “professional grouping”,
Durkheim meant that the various industrial branches of an economy
would be grouped into corporations (modelled on the feudal
corporation). Unlike unions, corporations would constituted by both
employers and employees, and would have the power to regulate wages,
conditions of work, appointments and promotions; they would also have
the authority to coordinate with other branches and with government.
The effect of such groupings would be to recreate solidarity where it
was most under pressure:
Within a political society [e.g., a corporation], as soon as a certain
number of individuals find they hold in common ideas, interests,
sentiments and occupations which the rest of the population does not
share in, it is inevitable that, under the influence of these
similarities, they should be attracted to one another. … It is
impossible for men to live together and be in regular contact with one
another without their acquiring some feeling for the totality which
they constitute through having united together, without their becoming
attached to it, concerning themselves with its interests and taking it
into account in their behaviour. (Durkheim 1893/1902 [1984:
17–8])
The idea was that, in grouping together in smaller, functionally
organized units individuals would regain their sense of contributing
to society while, at the same time, giving everyone a felt stake in
the justice and fairness required to reproduce it. In sum, organic
solidarity refers to the bonds of mutual sacrifice and attraction that
develop when each citizen realizes how the contribution they make to
the overall functioning of the society as a whole, via their economic
and social role, depends on a tightly knit, interdependent web of more
particular associations.
2.3 National Solidarity
The nineteenth-century nationalist takes over the term from the
socialists to describe the unity of a nation in its struggle about
external forces. For the nationalist, solidarity is anchored in shared
identification with an “imagined community” where
membership is defined not in terms of class or social position, but in
terms of an underlying way of life characterized by common folkways,
mores, and a shared history of struggle. In 1882, Ernest Renan claimed
that the nation is an expression of a
great solidarity (une grande solidarité), constituted
by a sense of the common sacrifices that have been made and that one
is disposed to make again. (Renan 1882: 29)
And Giuseppe Mazzini, whose version of liberal-republican nationalism
was to have such a great influence on nationalist movements across the
world, writes in 1871:
The individual’s means and his thirty or forty years of adult
life are but a tiny drop in the vast Ocean of existence. As soon as he
becomes aware of this, he ends up discouraged and abandons the entire
undertaking. If he is a good man, he will now and again engage in
simple charity. If he is evil, he will isolate himself in complete
selfishness. But give this man a Country [patria] and
establish a link of solidarity [solidarietà] between
his individual efforts and the efforts of all subsequent generations;
place him in association with the labors of 25 to 30 million men who
speak the same language, have similar habits and beliefs, profess
faith in the same goal, and have developed specific tools for
their work as required by the general conditions of their land, and
the problem will change for him at once: his strengths will be greatly
multiplied, allowing him to feel up to the task. (“Nazionalismo
e Nazionalità” 1871 [2009: 63])
On this understanding, the nation is understood primarily as a project
in which each participates over time and across generations. This same
understanding has carried over to contemporary nationalists. For
them,
a common history, territory, and shared bonds of belonging give rise
to a commitment to a common project, namely to reproduce and defend
the patria. As in workers’ movements, the struggle,
furthermore, requires a preparedness to come to each other’s aid
in realizing the project.
2.4 Christian Solidarity
Solidarity becomes increasingly important in Christian, especially
Catholic, thought and practice beginning at the end of the nineteenth
century and takes flight with the papacy of John Paul
II.[7]
In response to the rising importance of socialism and class conflict
in the middle of the nineteenth century, the Church realizes the need
to address the situation of the worker. In the Church’s
response, Pope Leo XIII’s Rerum Novarum (1891)—a
staple of Catholic social thought—tries to steal a march on the
socialists by incorporating and reworking one of the socialist’s
main rallying points, namely the idea of mutualism within
worker’s associations. In those passages, Leo cites Ecclesiastes
approvingly on the importance of fraternity:
“It is better that two should be together than one; for they
have the advantage of their society. If one fall he shall be supported
by the other. Woe to him that is alone, for when he falleth he hath
none to lift him up”. And further: “A brother that is
helped by his brother is like a strong city”. It is this natural
impulse which binds men together in civil society; and it is likewise
this which leads them to join together in associations. (Leo XIII
1891: §50)
But it was not until much later that the term gets used explicitly. In
the 1967 encyclical Populorum Progressio, on global
development and the inequality between rich and poor nations, Pope
Paul VI invokes the unmistakably Solidarist notion that
interdependence creates social obligations:
We are the heirs of earlier generations, and we reap benefits from the
efforts of our contemporaries; we are under obligation to all men.
Therefore we cannot disregard the welfare of those who will come after
us to increase the human family. The reality of human solidarity
brings us not only benefits but also obligations. (§17)
The origin of the Church’s union of interdependence and
solidarity lies in an earlier nineteenth-century current of thought
often referred to as Christian Solidarism. In Ethics and the
National Economy (1918), its founder and most prominent advocate,
Heinrich Pesch (1854–1926), writes:
Christianity teaches us that people, despite all individual and also
social differences in occupation and ownership, are nevertheless
socii, i.e., comrades, precisely by virtue of those
differences. They are dependent on each other and bound together by a
solidaristic community of interests in all of their
industrial relationships as masters and journeymen, as employers and
workers, and in the human race overall, which is the great universal
family of nations. (Pesch 1918 [2004: 104])
On this corporatist understanding, it is not just the shared
experience of human suffering, or the understanding of the human being
as imago dei, but a recognition of the interdependence of
human beings in society that grounds a demand to share one
another’s fate. On this picture, we are meant to recognize how
both our flourishing and our suffering is a result of mutual influence
and mutual reliance in and through the multiple associations to which
we belong; in response, we have obligations to share others’
fates by coming to others’ aid and by limiting the harm we
do.
As is widely recognized, John Paul II was also deeply influenced by
this strand of Catholic Social Thought (and its realization in Leo
XIII’s Rerum
Novarum).[8]
In Sollicitudo rei socialis, he writes:
When interdependence becomes recognized […], the correlative
response as a moral and social attitude, as a “virtue”, is
solidarity. This then is not a feeling of vague compassion or shallow
distress at the misfortunes of so many people, both near and far. On
the contrary, it is a firm and persevering determination to commit
oneself to the common good; that is to say to the good of all and of
each individual, because we are all really responsible for all. (John
Paul II 1987: §V)
On this reading, the ground of solidarity is, as in Bourgeois and
Durkheim, an identification based on our role in the division of
labor, which includes a recognition that participation in an
unjust social order perpetuates suffering, and makes us accomplices.
The doctrine goes hand in hand with the Church’s teaching on
subsidiarity, in which local associations—including perhaps most
importantly the family—have ethical priority to more general,
encompassing associations, such as the state. More general and
encompassing organizing units should intervene in the affairs of the
lower only to help or aid them in the accomplishment of their tasks.
On this understanding, the response to individual suffering must be
collective; it cannot be done by individuals acting alone, but by each
body, at each level of generality, working together as a unit to
preserve the common good. As Pope Francis noted in a follow-up
catechism to his COVID19 encyclical Fratelli Tutti,
there is no true solidarity without social participation, without the
contribution of intermediary bodies: families, associations,
cooperatives, small businesses, and other expressions of society.
Everyone needs to contribute, everyone. (Francis
2020)[9]
2.5 Solidarity in social movements
In the late twentieth century, the predominant context in which
solidarity has had a place are modern social movements, such as
anticolonial, black, feminist, LGBTQ, and disabled struggles. It would
take us too far afield to review how solidarity is deployed in each
one of these movements. But it useful to give a sense of the kind of
questions that have motivated those engaged in them. One of the
central questions is the following: What should the basis of
the black, anticolonial, women’s movements, and so on, be?
Should, for example, the women’s movement be grounded in an idea
of sisterhood—on what unites women as women—or on
a commitment to the (feminist) cause (or both, or neither)? Should
black solidarity (for example in the US) be based in a shared
ethnocultural identity as a nation, or in common subjection to
oppression (or both, or neither)? Should Indigenous anti-colonial
movements in Canada be grounded in particular territorially-based
shared ways of life, or in broader commitments to overthrowing
European colonialism wherever it exists (or both, or neither)? (see,
e.g., Coulthard 2014; Simpson 2017). To give a sense of the debates,
we will focus on black solidarity and the idea of sisterhood.
Should solidarity among women as women be grounded in some
kind of shared experience of womanhood? It has become a staple of the
feminist literature that there is no shared experience of
simply being a woman. The attempt to identify a canonical list of
experiences that characterizes “being a woman” is likely
to lead to subtle forms of exclusion. Previous such attempts, it is
often argued, have reproduced the cis-gendered experiences of white,
middle-class women, and have marginalized the experiences of women
whose experiences do not fit on the list (Lorde 1984; Hill Collins
1990 [2000]; hooks 2000 [2015]; Combahee River Collective 1977/1983;
Spelman 1988). See also entry on
feminist perspectives on sex and gender.
The alternative to grounding sisterhood in shared experience or shared
oppression is to ground it in commitment to a cause or
coalition against patriarchy. The trouble with this view is
that it leaves open the question of how this defines a distinctive
form of sisterhood, rather than a form of feminist
solidarity. But is there anything distinctive about solidarity among
women as women? If so, what are its grounds?
One response is to ground sisterhood not in a shared
experience but in a shared condition of
oppression—where that condition is experienced in different ways
according to one’s overall structural position (which may be
further influenced by intersecting factors, such as race, class,
sexuality, and religion) (see, e.g., Young 1994).
This possible response to the challenge from exclusion invites a
further objection: if sisterhood is supposed to be grounded in a
shared condition defined by relations to a given set of socially
conditioned material objects (primarily the socially sexed body and
its reproductive functions), then doesn’t this also exclude? If
this is supposed to ground an identification among women as women,
then doesn’t sisterhood required constructing a shared narrative
regarding what these relations are how they condition the sexed body?
(Shrage 2009) But then doesn’t this just reinvite the challenge
from exclusion, since different women—depending on their
structural position—will find themselves subordinated and
oppressed by a different conglomeration of socially salient relations
and practices? Think, for example, of transgender women, or the
variety of ways in which race, sexuality, class, gender, and religion
intersect.[10]
Similar questions arise when considering the nature of Black
(American) solidarity. Should such solidarity be grounded in a shared
ethnocultural identity, in a shared condition as oppressed, in an
anti-racist cause as such, or in something else again (such as a
shared fate)? (These grounds are not, of course, exclusive: one might
believe that black solidarity should be grounded in both
ethnocultural identity and in the sense of sharing a distinct
condition of oppression.) An important strand of black
nationalism—one that was especially prominent in the1960s and
70s—holds that high-sounding appeals to the possibility of
integration in the name of a universal fight against injustice cannot
ground a robust solidarity among blacks. A deeper, widespread
engagement with a distinct culture is needed. According to this form
of nationalism, Black Americans (as descendants of slaves violently
abducted from Africa and elsewhere) constitute a distinct, and
distinctly cultural, nation-within-a-nation (Robinson 2001; Moses
1978). Nationalists argue that, though at the moment marginalized and
divided within itself, black culture calls for development and
expression (for example, in the arts, music, literature, and theatre)
(Cruse 1967); without it, and the sense of collective identity and
pride it secures, blacks cannot securely win their freedom in a
fundamentally hostile American society (see, e.g., Malcolm X 1970
[1992]; cf. Rivers 1995).
Many black liberals demur: while black cultural, economic, social,
cultural and political autonomy can be, in certain circumstances,
strategically useful in the fight against anti-black racism, it is
wrong-headed to insist on cultural unity as the basis of black
solidarity. Insisting on cultural unity is divisive and unnecessarily
exclusionary given the broad diversity of ethnic and social
backgrounds in the black community. Black solidarity should be
grounded, instead, on “thin” blackness, namely on shared
experiences of anti-black racism (see, e.g., Shelby 2005: 245; Hill
Collins 1990 [2000]; cf. Gooding-Williams 2009).
2.6 Conclusion
In this section, we have reviewed some of the salient histories in
which use of the term “solidarity” has figured. The survey
has had two functions. First, it has served to provide an overview of
the political and social uses for which solidarity has been enlisted.
Doing so enables us to frame the descriptive and normative challenges
that any theory of solidarity faces: Does solidarity have a single
nature that is repeated across different paradigmatic instances? Or is
it a malleable, vague term with no fixed content? What, if anything,
makes solidarity valuable? What should the grounds of solidarity be
in, for example, different social movements, in the welfare state, or
in political and social associations more broadly? Second, the survey
provides a testing ground for new theories of solidarity, which, we
have argued, should be responsive to the concept’s history.
Theories should be adopted and rejected according to whether they
successfully serve to describe, evaluate, and guide the various
practices in which the term figures, and has figured. While a theory
might recommend conceptual change, of course, it needs to be clear why
and how such a change is worth making. Either way, being aware of the
concept’s history is crucial since solidarity names not just an
ideal but a concrete set of practices.
3. The Value of Solidarity
It should be fairly uncontroversial that solidarity can have
instrumental value: when members of a marginalized group
develop bonds of solidarity by committing to each other and, as a
result of being in (or acting from) solidarity, they manage to
overcome their oppression, then solidarity has value because of its
causal/instrumental role. Similarly, it should not be controversial
that solidarity can have instrumental disvalue: even well-meaning,
morally justified acts undertaken in the spirit of solidarity can lead
to unforeseen and regrettable consequences. The more interesting and
challenging question is whether solidarity, as a social practice, also
has non-instrumental value (or disvalue). But before we move on to
this issue, let’s briefly list some of the instrumental values
that solidarity in different forms typically facilitates:
Most notably, solidarity improves a collective’s ability to
pursue projects. By committing to each other and experiencing unity,
fellows in solidarity establish a robust basis of mutual
identification that allows them to solve coordination issues and
pursue joint action that is more likely to succeed than if each acted
on their own (Shelby 2005). Groups that display solidarity also tend
to care for each other in beneficial ways, e.g., by protecting
vulnerable members or limiting social inequality amongst themselves
(Banting & Kymlicka 2017; Miller 2017). Beyond this, solidarity
has certain epistemic and relational benefits: whether as a result of
shared goals, shared experience, or shared oppression (see above),
fellows in solidarity consider each other trustworthy participants in
the pursuit of the common good, and they share information, jointly
deliberate and learn from each other about how to understand adversity
and oppression and pursue strategies to overcome it (Harvey 2007 on
epistemic solidarity; Goodin & Spiekermann 2015; Wiland 2017).
Does solidarity have value beyond these good consequences? Perhaps
some quick terminology is helpful. Non-instrumental value is value
that does not derive from making a contribution to something else.
Non-instrumental value is intrinsic if the value stems from
some (necessary?) internal property of the object (see: Intrinsic
vs. Extrinsic Value). Implicitly relying on such a notion of
intrinsic non-instrumental value, several authors have claimed that
solidarity’s value could only ever be instrumental. Rainer
Forst, for example, argues that solidarity could not be
“something intrinsically good, since a Mafia family
very much depends on the solidarity of its members”
(forthcoming) and he concludes that, therefore, solidarity is
“normatively dependent”. Other authors concur with this
judgment: solidarity is aimed at realizing justice or
overcoming oppression, and it is valuable when and because it realizes
this aim (Kohn forthcoming). The structure of the negative argument
here is clear enough:
If solidarity has non-instrumental value, then each
instance of it has value
Unity amongst mafia members is an instance of
solidarity
Unity amongst mafia members has no value
Therefore, solidarity has no non-instrumental
value.
Therefore, no internal property of solidarity
practices that is valuable as such, independent of the consequences
that it produces
There is, however, an interesting overlap here with an issue we
mentioned in
section 2,
namely whether or not solidarity ought to be moralized: according to
some authors that analyze such “pernicious solidarities”
as the one that prevails amongst mafia clans and white supremacists,
the correct response to Forst’s case is not to reject
that the idea that solidarity has non-instrumental value, but to deny
premise (2):
it is precisely for the reason that solidarity necessarily has some
good-making internal properties that we should not consider unity
amongst mafia members an instance of it.
It is not obvious how to resolve this potential disagreement. Is there
perhaps some other way to proceed? A better approach, we think, is
available if we scrutinize
premise (1):
Intrinsic value is just one way in which a practice could have
non-instrumental value. Whilst it may be true that a practice only has
intrinsic value if each instance of it has value, this is compatible
with its being non-instrumentally valuable in non-intrinsic ways. Here
are some important considerations: Only attributing instrumental value
to solidarity does, intuitively, seem to run up against at least two
kinds of cases. First, defenders of the non-instrumental value of
solidarity may point to the intuitive force of “futile
solidarity”: when the exploited workers come together to fight
for their rights in solidarity, we are likely to consider this
valuable even if their effort is ultimately thwarted. Second,
there is the very plausible thought that, somehow, a special kind of
value is realized when bad or unjust aspects of the world are brought
to an end through acts of solidarity: when the workers’ combined
agency causes the end of their oppression rather than, say, the
unexpected change of mind of their exploitative bosses, something
especially valuable has occurred.
Now of course there are things that defenders of the
“instrumental only” thesis can say in response: for
example, they may point out that there still are good consequences in
each of these examples, even if the overall goal has not been
realized. For example, there may be a sense of shared destiny or
reciprocal commitment amongst workers to each other that is
caused by solidarity. It is this reciprocal commitment (and
what it can lead to) that has value, not solidarity as such. The
problem with this response is that it seems to misdescribe the
relation between solidarity and whatever good has occurred in the
world. The reciprocal commitment that workers have towards each other,
for example, is not “caused” by solidarity: rather,
solidarity is partly or wholly constituted by it. One
suggestion, then, is that solidarity has non-instrumental value of a
non-intrinsic kind. What does this mean? The idea is that solidarity
is part-constitutive of something that is non-instrumentally valuable.
This allows for there to be some practice x that satisfies our
criteria for being solidaristic, and yet, it does not have value. But
it preserves the idea that solidarity is not only good for what it
causes but, if the right circumstances obtain, it is an integral
element in something that is intrinsically good.
There are at least two ways in which we might flesh out
solidarity’s non-instrumental value, one more individualistic
and one more collective. The more individualistic approach suggests
that we can understand solidarity’s non-instrumental value as
analogous to the value of other good dispositions and attitudes that
an agent can have. Specifically, philosophers thinking about the
goodness of virtue have argued that appropriately responding to
something that has value is itself something of (intrinsic) value, as
is negatively responding to something that has disvalue (Hurka 2001).
The connection to virtue works as follows: when an agent responds to
the adversity that they or others face by developing solidaristic
attitudes and dispositions—say by committing to ending
oppression with others picked out by the cause—then their having
these solidarist attitudes is non-instrumentally valuable because they
are negatively reacting to something that is of disvalue (oppression,
adversity etc.). But, and here is the rub, the agent’s response
is only valuable when it constitutes the correct
response to the relevant feature of the world. The white
supremacist’s solidarity is not valuable because the thing
against which his solidarity is directed, namely racial equality, is a
valuable state of affairs. But negatively responding to something that
has value clearly lacks non-instrumental value. This individualist
account of solidarity’s non-instrumental value is attractive
because it can account equally well for cases of “solidarity
amongst” and “solidarity with”. Moreover, it equally
applies to cases where agents privately develop the relevant
solidaristic attitudes without actually acting on them (e.g.,
discussed in Bommarito 2016; Zhao 2019; and Viehoff forthcoming).
Insofar as we think that their attitudes are valuable, some account
along these lines seems necessary to account for it.
But perhaps there is something missing from this individualistic
picture: one of the objections to those suggesting that solidarity
only has instrumental value relied on the idea that there is value in
people realizing a goal together. Shouldn’t our account
of solidarity’s non-instrumental value also be able to capture
this aspect? Recent literature has accounted for this in broadly two
ways (though these are not necessarily exclusive): Avery Kolers
maintains that, quite independently of pursuing justified aims,
solidarity groups constitute just (in his words
“equitable”) relations amongst participants. For Kolers,
in following the demands of solidarity and acting together,
we are not only working to (teleologically) bring about the end of
oppression; rather, we constitutively embody a non-oppressive
alternative world—even if, as is likely, our joint efforts
ultimately fail, in part or in whole. (Kolers 2016: 123–4)
So one way of highlighting non-instrumental collective value ensues
from focusing on the kind of community that relations of solidarity
give rise to: in acting together in the specific way required by the
ideal of solidarity, fellows already conform to norms of equity or
justice that they seek to bring about more widely.
Another line of argument is developed by Sangiovanni, who argues that,
when successfully pursuing valuable goals together, we create
non-instrumentally valuable joint agency:
We take pleasure in the exercise of those reciprocal, mutually
adjusted, and mutually reinforcing capabilities that have enabled us
to overcome forms of adversity that would have been impossible to
overcome alone. The collective activity of overcoming […] comes
to have non-instrumental value. (Sangiovanni forthcoming)
However, and similar to the more individualistic argument, the value
of jointly exercised agency is conditional: acting
successfully to overcome some obstacle is non-instrumentally valuable
only if the overcoming constitutes an achievement that is
worthwhile.
4. Challenges to Solidarity
Turning to criticisms of solidarity in this section, we start by
distinguishing different kinds of criticism along different
dimensions. Perhaps most importantly, one must distinguish between, on
the one hand, challenges to solidarity as a social practice (or a
range of social practices), and, on the other hand, criticism of
theories of solidarity. We will call criticisms of the former kind
“practical challenges” to solidarity and will address
those of the latter kind as “theoretical challenges”.
Practical and theoretical challenges are clearly independent of each
other. For example, one can think that we need a clear account of what
solidarity is, even if one holds that solidarity practices have, on
the whole, negative consequences for political life.
Theoretical challenges to solidarity can conceivably take
many forms, but we will focus here on the related charges of
conceptual incoherence and theoretical redundancy.
The former challenge is that uses of solidarity, both common sense and
philosophical, are simply too diffuse and incoherent to allow for any
adequate and theoretically productive definition. If those using the
concept of solidarity in political or philosophical debate are more
likely than not to misunderstand or speak past each other, then we
should not use the concept. The latter challenge is that, from a
theoretical standpoint, we don’t need to add solidarity to the
fundamental philosophical concepts in the discipline because we can
have everything we want by reflecting on alternative concepts and
theories that have already been more thoroughly developed, for example
justice, community, or equality.
When it comes to practical challenges to solidarity, critics
argue that solidarity tends to have negative consequences and that,
therefore, we should not promote it. We can further differentiate
these practical challenges in terms of, first, the kind of negative
consequences that are attributed to solidarity and, second, the kind
of solidarity practices that are judged to be vulnerable to this
challenge. In relation to the former, the most prominent criticisms
concern solidarity’s impact on the realization of other
important social and political values. One historically important line
of criticism to solidarity argues that solidarity threatens
liberty (Arendt, Shklar, Kateb). Others worry that solidarity
creates unfair forms of inequality between those within a solidary
group and those who are excluded (Scheffler 2001). Whilst the
criticism focus on negative effects on outsiders, critics have also
argued that solidarity may have negative effects on participants.
Perhaps most notably, some have claimed that solidarity stymies
pluralism and diversity. A related but distinct
worry is that solidarity promotes—or perhaps even
requires—false beliefs and self-conceptions amongst participants
(Margalit 2017; Shelby forthcoming).
Before we move on to specific arguments, a point about generality: We
maintain that, for a criticism to amount to a “challenge”
to solidarity, it must rise to a certain level of generality, i.e., it
must apply to a range of accounts of solidarity.
4.1 Theoretical criticism of solidarity
Since we are here interested in theoretical challenges to
solidarity (and not just objections to particular accounts),
we focus on challenges that, if true, would undermine the very
endeavor of elevating solidarity’s place amongst significant
theoretical concepts in the discipline.
4.1.1 Conceptual incoherence
A first theoretical worry about solidarity is that, given the
diversity of linguistic usage, the range of contexts of application,
and the breadth of phenomena addressed in the philosophical literature
under the label, solidarity is conceptually incoherent. How might this
be the case? To use a somewhat far-fetched example, imagine that we
were charged with developing an account of the descriptive features,
goodness or permissibility of all human activities that start with the
letter “L”. Because the actions picked out by our category
are simply too heterogeneous (there is nothing interesting that
laughing and lying, let alone loving and lynching have in common), any
theorizing would be pointless. Could it be the case that
“solidarity” picks out a set of actions and practices that
are simply too heterogeneous to lead to anything theoretically
insightful? Niklas Luhmann, for example, suggested that solidarity is
obsolete, a mere “formula of ideology” without determinate
content (Luhmann [1984] quoted in Thome 1999: 101).
Despite the initial plausibility of this objection to theorizing
solidarity, we think that solidarity theorists have powerful responses
available. First, they can point to similarities that unify the
descriptive, normative and evaluative features of instantiations of
solidarity, even those as diverse as those mentioned above. For
example, different authors have sought to show that despite their
initial heterogeneity, solidarity in all these contexts descriptively
entails a form of identification, or a sentiment of unity, or some
orientation towards overcoming an obstacle or adversity, or some
combination of these elements (Scholz 2008; Taylor 2015; Prainsack
& Buyx 2017). Moreover, authors have subcategorized solidarity
along social contexts—political solidarity, civic
solidarity—(Bayertz 1999a; Scholz 2008), thereby organizing our
heterogeneous linguistic use to allow for useful theoretical
approaches to more determinate social practices of
solidarity. Finally, theorists of solidarity can respond that, in
providing a theoretical/philosophical account of solidarity, there is
some freedom to make revisionary proposals about what should
count as solidarity. Our (descriptive, normative, evaluative)
understanding of solidarity is advanced if we “sharpen”
our account of solidarity by excluding some peripheral uses, then that
may well be legitimate and will limit the charge of
incoherence. Theorists of solidarity may also point to other social
and political concepts to claim that heterogeneous use both in
everyday discourse and among philosophers is rarely considered a
convincing reason to abstain from theorizing concepts like freedom,
equality, justice, and the like. Why treat solidarity differently?
4.1.2 Theoretical redundancy
Faced with this appeal to other political concepts, critics may
retreat to a related but distinct criticism: They may accept that
concepts like freedom and equality too are beset with complexity and
conceptual disagreements that need to be resolved. But they can then
insist that there is no need to take up this difficult endeavor for
solidarity because—contrary to liberty, equality
etc.—there is no need for a theory of solidarity. This is the
charge of theoretical redundancy: we can gain exactly the
same explanatory mileage by using existing concepts and categories
without theorizing solidarity. Descriptively, existing work
on altruism, community and relations of loyalty might serve us just as
well as accounts of solidarity: all of the relations that were
described as solidaristic above are also (more or less intimate)
communal relations amongst people. Normatively, the critic
might suggest that we can reduce the claims generated by solidarity to
requirements of justice, fairness, equality, and the like. And
evaluatively, we can appeal to the general goodness of
special bonds and relationships for the realization of a flourishing
life, whether they are bonds of friendship, family, religion, or
political community. If this were the case, then theorizing solidarity
would be redundant, and ultimately, pointless. Why not, in a spirit of
parsimony, simply rely on the concepts and theories we already
have?
Again, we think that defenders of solidarity have good replies
available: Perhaps the strongest response to the challenge of
redundancy is to provide a substantive account of solidarity in terms
of its distinctive descriptive, normative and evaluative features. If
such an account is illuminating, then the charge of redundancy seems
beside the point. More specifically, theorists of solidarity can
appeal to distinctive descriptive or positive features of
solidarity practices that make it inappropriate to subsume solidarity
under a generic account of community and loyalty (see discussion in
Kolers 2016: chapter 2). Unlike those bonds of friendship and family,
for example, solidarity is purposive (goal-oriented), both in the
sense that solidarity aims for the achievement of overcoming some
obstacle or adversity and in the sense that fellows are picked de
dicto in terms of the cause that is pursued rather than in some
goal-independent manner (Arnsperger & Varoufakis 2003; Kolers
2016). In terms of normative distinctiveness, theorists of solidarity
may also object to the critic’s implied assumption that a
theoretical account of x’s normative properties loses its
usefulness when we discover that these properties supervene on or are
explained by a more general moral consideration.
4.2 Practical challenges to Solidarity
We now move on to the practical challenges of solidarity. Should we be
critical of real-world solidarity practices because they lead to bad
consequences? Or may there perhaps even be something constitutively
problematic about solidarity movements? Three prominent objections
relate to solidarity’s impact on liberty, fairness, and
truth.
4.2.1 Does solidarity threaten liberty?
Does solidarity muffle liberty? In her celebrated essay the
“Liberalism of Fear”, Judith Shklar claims it does. She
writes:
We must therefore be suspicious of ideologies of solidarity, precisely
because they are so attractive to those who find liberalism
emotionally unsatisfying, and who have gone on in our century to
create oppressive and cruel regimes of unparalleled horror. […]
To seek emotional and personal development in the bosom of a community
or in romantic self-expression is a choice open to citizens in liberal
societies. Both, however, are apolitical impulses and wholly
self-oriented, which at best distract us from the main task of
politics when they are presented as political doctrines, and at worst
can, under unfortunate circumstances, seriously damage liberal
practices. For although both appear only to be redrawing the
boundaries between the personal and the public […] it cannot be
said that either one has a serious sense of the implications of the
proposed shifts in either direction. (Shklar 1989: 36)
There is, one might think, an element of truth here: theorists of
solidarity tend to emphasize that solidarity becomes important when
and because we sense the need for collective resistance and unity of
purpose in the face of adversity. They also stress the
non-instrumental value in setting aside self-interest in a horizontal
identification with others on behalf of a shared goal, where part of
what is valued is our seeing, together, our collective agency
reflected in the ends we pursue (see previous section).
The element of identification may seem particularly problematic.
Identification requires, among other things, coming to see others as
“like oneself”, and taking that similarity as a basis for
joint concern, empathy, and normative orientation. So, for example,
when I identify with you as a worker, I see our common role
as providing an important orientation in my life. In this sense,
solidarity demands that one set aside the personal for the political
(thus “redrawing the boundaries” between them). The worry
is that, at least in politics, solidarity’s demand for
similarity, commitment, and loyalty leads to unfreedom and
tyranny.[11]
Faced with this fundamental challenge, theorists of solidarity have at
least two arguments: First, they may insist that it is false to treat
a commitment to solidarity as incompatible with a commitment to
liberalism. To be sure, solidarities organized to promote illiberal
ends by illiberal means are, well, illiberal by definition. But their
disregard for individual rights or freedom or equality is not entailed
or required by their solidarity. Indeed, if, as Shklar and others
emphasize, liberalism demands vigilance, hatred of injustice, and a
readiness to resist power when necessary, then liberalism requires
solidarity. Resistance is most effective when it is conducted by
groups whose grievances are shared and known to be shared.
These grievances provide a spring for joint action, and a powerful
source of identification. Such identification is necessary to overcome
fear, and it allows people to act pro-socially by looking beyond their
immediate self-interest to the larger task at hand.
A second reason why these challenges are not fully convincing is this:
In Shklar the target is what we might call state-level
solidarity. Though they do not name it, their target is national or
patriotic solidarity—solidarity as invoked by those who have
political power and who aim to rally the people against an enemy, or
solidarity as it is invoked by those who believe that active, partisan
political participation is essential for a flourishing life. The first
response is simply to point out (as this entry does) that solidarity
can be at the heart of social movements and bottom-up political
action. It need not be solely focused on or through the state. The
second response is that even state-level solidarity need not be so
pernicious. Civic solidarity need not enforce blind conformity,
disrespect difference or disagreement, or raze
plurality.[12]
There is a rich tradition in the history of political
ideas—stretching from Leon
Bourgeois’[13]
solidarism to present writings—that grounds civic solidarity
not in some “totalizing” pre-political identity, but in
the mutual interdependence of citizens and their democratic
co-authorship of justice-preserving
institutions.[14]
4.2.2 Does solidarity promote false beliefs?
Solidarity, it was said, imposes not only demands on what to do but
also on what fellows should believe. With regard to such beliefs,
solidarity requires fellows to see each other as united by some common
feature, or condition or experience. Does solidarity systematically
lead to false beliefs amongst members of solidarity groups, for
example about what unites them?
Perhaps most prominently, the question of the relationship
between—in this case, historical—truth and the
kind of collective group identification necessary for solidarity has
come up in debates about (liberal) nationalism. Here, the charge
against nationalist solidarity is that, for essentially instrumental
purposes, national identity both relies on and promotes false beliefs
amongst members about some glorified national past (Abizadeh 2004).
Other forms of solidarity need not, of course, rely on some shared
historical origins amongst participants. But the challenge can be
generalized: insofar as solidarity requires some ground for mutual
identification, whether shared experience, shared oppression, or
shared goals, there is a danger that the practice systematically
guides participants to overestimate those identification-grounding
features at the expense of other, perhaps more salient, elements that
are not shared amongst them. To go back to two earlier examples,
sisterhood may require participants to see some feature of their
identity (“being a woman”) as particularly important when,
in fact, their de facto situation of social disadvantage is (also)
fundamentally structured by other categories like race or class.
Similarly, black solidarity asks participants to focus on whatever
grounds commonality amongst blacks, even if their actual social
position is shaped by matters of class, gender, migration status, and
so on (Shelby forthcoming).
Confronted with the fact that much of what is promulgated as part of
shared national history does not hold up against the historical
record, liberal nationalists like David Miller (1995) have responded
that “myths” about a national collective’s past need
not be true so long as they serve the purpose of supporting those
attitudes that underpin valuable national solidarity. But irrespective
of whether or not they are useful, they are untrue,
and, to the extent that the group identification necessary for
national solidarity depends on it, it depends on having false
beliefs.
Does this worry generalize to all forms of solidarity? One important
difference between national solidarity and other forms is that most
other solidarities do not typically depend on beliefs in something
that is manifestly untrue. Rather, they emphasize the relevance of
some genuine aspect of a person’s practical
identity—whether it is shared experience, shared oppression,
shared goals etc.—over others. We might add that whether or not
some feature is salient for one’s practical identity
is, at least to a degree, up to the relevant agent. So one
conciliatory response that defenders of (non-national) solidarity
might offer is that solidarity does not depend on belief in
falsehoods, but rather that it expresses which aspects of their
identity participants take to be important. They might add that,
insofar as there is free deliberation both about what unites and,
importantly, what divides participants to solidarity movements, the
charge of promoting false beliefs is beside the point. In a more
combative vein, they may also add that, at least in some cases,
solidarity is actually a necessary element for the formation of
correct beliefs about one’s own and others’ predicament.
Wiland describes this as epistemic solidarity (Wiland 2017:
69). Thus, standing in solidarity with others that have suffered from
similar instances of adversity and oppression can be a necessary
condition for enabling each other to make sense of our predicament: We
form true beliefs about our shared predicament and improve our ability
to define and fight oppressive conditions by being able to trust each
other’s oppression-related testimony (Goodin & Spiekermann
2015).
4.2.3 Is solidarity exclusionary / unfair towards outsiders?
Whatever else solidarity entails descriptively; it entails a special
commitment to one’s solidarity fellows that one does not hold
towards everybody else. And whatever normative consequences solidarity
has for those in solidarity, it will ground some special
claims that these fellows have on us and we on them. In this sense,
solidarity, like friendship, family, and nationality, constitutes a
special relationship with special obligations. Over recent decades, a
number of philosophers have raised challenges to the very idea that
special obligations can be justified towards those who are not part of
them. Perhaps most prominently, Samuel Scheffler has raised a
fairness-based “distributive objection” to all special
relationships (Scheffler 2001). If fellows in solidarity form special
relationships with special obligations, then, does Scheffler’s
criticism apply here too?
The distributive objection builds on the idea that participants to
special relationships receive special benefits from each other: qua
membership, we are owed not just more from fellow participants than we
are from outsiders, but we are also owed priority, in at least some
instances. What the distributive objection observes is that members
already benefit from the relationship goods that are constitutively
tied to being in a meaningful relationship. The problem is that, then,
fellows also owe less to outsiders then they did beforehand: Special
relationships—including solidarity relations—thus
function, to use Scheffler’s memorable phrase, like “moral
tax shelters” to those who already benefit.
Whilst several authors have rejected the general thrust of the
distributive objection (Kolodny 2002; Lazar 2009), we want to point to
some features of solidarity that should provide specific cover against
this challenge. Crucially, friends of solidarity may stress that
unlike friendship or love relations, solidarity obligations are not
necessarily grounded in the value of the relationship, but in
relationship-independent value that comes from having these duties.
Special duties of solidarity would then be justified more like role
obligations—lawyers, for example, have fiduciary duties to
represent their client’s interests not because of the
non-instrumental value of lawyer-client relationships, but because of
the advantages that vesting them with such duties has for the
system’s overall ability to optimally realize impartial moral
demands (such as protecting innocent defendants). On this strategy,
duties of solidarity would ultimately be grounded in non-partial
values like fairness and natural justice. How might this justification
run? Many of our positive general duties are imperfect, so that even
well-meaning people are likely to face significant obstacles in
discharging them: it requires the ability to coordinate our actions in
complex ways with others; and we must also be motivated to make
contributions in light of other important projects and relationships.
If the special obligations that flow from solidarity commitments can
provide us with a robust way of solving issues of coordination and
motivation (because, following a solidarity-commitment, discharging
our general duties through solidarity somehow better aligns with our
personal projects) then those obligations could be justified by an
appeal to impartial moral considerations (Kolers 2016; Viehoff
forthcoming).
But even for those who think that some duties of solidarity
are grounded in the non-instrumental value of solidaristic fellowship,
there are important responses available: First, solidarity (at least
in its most paradigmatic forms) establishes unity amongst those
suffering from injustice or oppression, so it rather far from
providing some kind of indirect protection from more extensive duties
towards the more vulnerable. Second, special responsibilities towards
our fellows, like other special duties, are not absolute: very
plausibly, they are constrained by general demands of justice. So even
if special obligations among fellows in solidarity could ground some
partiality, these duties would be limited by more weighty
considerations of justice.
Do these responses answer all the possible objections of fairness and
exclusion? Probably not; questions of permissible solidaristic
partiality, especially amongst large-scale collectives like the state,
clearly depend on questions of social and global justice that cannot
be addressed here. So questions of the kinds of obligations that
solidarity practices can ground blend into issues of justice. But that
should not be surprising, nor should it prevent us from reflection on
solidarity in its own right.
Bibliography
Abizadeh, Arash, 2004, “Historical Truth, National Myths and
Liberal Democracy: On the Coherence of Liberal Nationalism”,
Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(3): 291–313.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00201.x
Appiah, Anthony, 1985, “The Uncompleted Argument: Du Bois
and the Illusion of Race”, Critical Inquiry, 12(1):
21–37. doi:10.1086/448319
Arendt, Hannah, 1963, On Revolution, New York: Viking
Press.
–––, 1951 [1973], The Origins of
Totalitarianism, New York: Harcourt, Brace. New edition, New
York: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovich, 1973.
Arnsperger, Christian and Yanis Varoufakis, 2003, “Toward a
Theory of Solidarity”, Erkenntnis, 59(2):
157–188. doi:10.1023/A:1024630228818
Banting, Keith and Will Kymlicka (eds.), 2017, The Strains of
Commitment: The Political Sources of Solidarity in Diverse
Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.001.0001
Bayertz, Kurt, 1999a, “Four Uses of
‘Solidarity’”, in Bayertz 1999b:3–28.
doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_1
––– (ed.), 1999b, Solidarity,
(Philosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture), Dordrecht: Springer
Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1
Blais, Marie-Claude, 2007, La solidarité: histoire
d’une idée, (Bibliothèque des idées),
Paris: Gallimard.
Bommarito, Nicolas, 2016, “Private Solidarity”,
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19(2): 445–455.
doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9640-2
Bourgeois, M. Léon, 1902, “Rapport de M. Léon
Bourgeois au Congrès d’Éducation Sociale en
1900”, in Solidarité, 3rd edition, by
M. Léon Bourgeois, Paris: Armand Colin, 159–188. [First
edition published in 1896.]
Bowles, Samuel and Herbert Gintis, 2011, “A Cooperative
Species”, in their A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity
and Its Evolution, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1–7.
Bratman, Michael, 2014, Shared Agency: A Planning Theory of
Acting Together, New York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199897933.001.0001
Carastathis, Anna, 2014, “The Concept of Intersectionality
in Feminist Theory”, Philosophy Compass, 9(5):
304–314. doi:10.1111/phc3.12129
Claeys, Gregory, 2011, “Non-Marxian Socialism
1815–1914”, in The Cambridge History of
Nineteenth-Century Political Thought, Gareth Stedman Jones and
Gregory Claeys (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
521–555. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521430562.018
Clark, Meghan J., 2014, The Vision of Catholic Social Thought:
The Virtue of Solidarity and the Praxis of Human Rights,
Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Combahee River Collective, 1977/1983, “A Black Feminist
Statement”, April 1977, Boston, MA. Printed in Home Girls: A
Black Feminist Anthology, Barbara Smith (ed.), New York: Kitchen
Table—Women of Color Press, 1983. New edition, New Brunswick,
NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000, 264–274.
Coulthard, Glen Sean, 2014, Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting
the Colonial Politics of Recognition, (Indigenous Americas),
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Crenshaw, Kimberle, 1991, “Mapping the Margins:
Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of
Color”, Stanford Law Review, 43(6): 1241–1299.
doi:10.2307/1229039
Cruse, Harold, 1967, The Crisis of the Negro Intellectual: A
Historical Analysis of the Failure of Black Leadership, New York:
William Morrow.
Dawson, Michael C., 2001, Black Visions: The Roots of
Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Dean, Jodi, 1995, “Reflective Solidarity”,
Constellations, 2(1): 114–140.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1995.tb00023.x
Deveaux, Monique, 2021, Poverty, Solidarity, and Poor-Led
Social Movements, New York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/oso/9780190850289.001.0001
Durkheim, Émile, 1928 [1959], Le socialisme: sa
définition, ses débuts, la doctrine
Saint-Simonienne, Marcel Mauss (ed.), (Travaux de
l’Année sociologique), Paris: F. Alcan. Translated as
Socialism and Saint-Simon, Charlotte Sattler (trans.), Yellow
Springs, OH: Antioch Press, 1959.
–––, 1893 [1984], De la division du travail
social, Paris: Félix Alcan; second edition 1902, third
edition 1911. Translated as The Division of Labor in Society,
W. D. Halls (trans.), New York: Free Press.
Dworkin, Ronald, 2011, Justice for Hedgehogs, Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Engels, Friedrich, 1876 [1978], Herrn Eugen Dühring's
Umwälzung der Wissenschaft, a translated abstract of which
was published as “Socialism: Utopian and Scientific” and
collected in Tucker 1978, pp. 683–718.
Faucci, Riccardo and Antonella Rancan, 2009, “Transforming
the Economy: Saint-Simon and His Influence on Mazzini”,
History of Economic Ideas, 17(2): 79–105.
Feinberg, Joel, 1973, Social Philosophy, (Foundations of
Philosophy Series), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Forst, Rainer, forthcoming, “Contexts of Solidarity”,
in Sangiovanni and Viehoff forthcoming.
Francis, 2020, “Catechesis ‘Healing the world’:
8. Subsidiarity and virtue of hope”, 23 September 2020.
[Francis 2020 available online]
Fricker, Miranda, 2007, Epistemic Injustice: Power and the
Ethics of Knowing, New York: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
Garton Ash, Timothy, 1983 [2002], The Polish Revolution:
Solidarity, London: J. Cape. Third edition, New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press, 2002.
Goodin, Robert E. and Kai Spiekermann, 2015, “Epistemic
Solidarity as a Political Strategy”, Episteme, 12(4):
439–457. doi:10.1017/epi.2015.29
Gooding-Williams, Robert, 2009, In the Shadow of Du Bois:
Afro-Modern Political Thought in America, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Gould, Carol C., 2007, “Transnational Solidarities”,
Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(1): 148–164.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00371.x
–––, 2020, “Motivating Solidarity with
Distant Others: Empathic Politics, Responsibility, and the Problem of
Global Justice”, in The Oxford Handbook of Global
Justice, Thom Brooks (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press,
121–138. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198714354.013.6
–––, forthcoming, “Rethinking Solidarity
through the Lens of Critical Social Ontology”, in Sangiovanni
and Viehoff forthcoming.
Glasgow, Joshua, 2009, A Theory of Race, New York:
Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203880951
Harvey, Jean, 2007, “Moral Solidarity and Empathetic
Understanding: The Moral Value and Scope of the Relationship”,
Journal of Social Philosophy, 38(1): 22–37.
doi:10.1111/j.1467-9833.2007.00364.x
Hayward, J. E. S., 1959, “Solidarity: The Social History of
an Idea in Nineteenth Century France”, International Review
of Social History, 4(2): 261–284.
doi:10.1017/S0020859000001371
Hechter, Michael, 2015, “Solidarity, Sociology of”, in
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral
Sciences, second edition, James D. Wright (ed.), Oxford:
Elsevier, 6–9. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32147-X
Hill Collins, Patricia, 1990 [2000], Black Feminist Thought:
Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment,
(Perspectives on Gender 2), Boston: Unwin Hyman. Second edition, New
York: Routledge, 2000. doi:10.4324/9780203900055
hooks, bell, 1981 [2015], Ain’t I a Woman, London:
Routledge. [First edition published 1981, second edition 2015.]
–––, 2000 [2015], Feminism Is for Everybody:
Passionate Politics, Cambridge, MA: South End Press. Second
edition, New York: Routledge, 2015.
Hurka, Thomas, 2001, Virtue, Vice, and Value, New York:
Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0195137167.001.0001
John Paul II, 1987, Sollicitudo rei socialis, 20 December
1987
[Sollicitudo rei socialis available online (English)]
Kateb, George, 1989, “Democratic Individuality and the
Meaning of Rights”, in Rosenblum 1989: 183–206 (ch. 10).
doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864443.c14
Kautsky, Karl, 1892 [1910], The Class Struggle: Erfurt
Program, trans. William Bohn, New York: Kerr & Co.
[Originally published as Das Erfurter Programm in seinem
grundsätzlichen Theil erläutert, Stuttgart:
Vorwärts.
Kohn, M., (forthcoming), “Solidarity: The Link Between Facts
and Norms”, in The Virtue of Solidarity, Andrea
Sangiovanni and Juri Viehoff (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Kolers, Avery, 2016, A Moral Theory of Solidarity,
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769781.001.0001
Kolodny, Niko, 2002, “Do Associative Duties Matter?”,
Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(3): 250–266.
doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00152
Koslowski, Peter, 2000, “Solidarism, Capitalism, and
Economic Ethics in Heinrich Pesch”, in The Theory of
Capitalism in the German Economic Tradition: Historism,
Ordo-Liberalism, Critical Theory, Solidarism, Peter Koslowski
(ed.), (Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy), Berlin/Heidelberg:
Springer, 371–396. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-04084-3_10
Land, Clare, 2015, Decolonizing Solidarity: Dilemmas and
Directions for Supporters of Indigenous Struggles, London: Zed
Books.
Lazar, Seth, 2009, “Debate: Do Associative Duties Really Not
Matter? 1”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 17(1):
90–101. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00329.x
Leo XIII, 1891, Rerum Novarum.
[Rerum Navarum available online (English)]
Leopold, David, 2015, “Scientific Socialism: The Case of
Robert Owen”, in Scientific Statesmanship, Governance and
the History of Political Philosophy, Kyriakos N. Demetriou and
Antis Loizides (eds.), New York: Routledge, 193–209.
Leroux, Pierre, 1840 [1845], De l’humanité: de
son principe, et de son avenir, où. se trouve exposée la
vraie définition de la religion et où l’on
explique le sens, la suite, et l’enchaînement du Mosaisme
et du Christianisme, Paris: Perrotin. Second edition 1845.
Lorde, Audre, 1984, Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches,
(Crossing Press Feminist Series), Freedom, CA: Crossing Press.
Luhmann, Niklas, 1984, “Die Differenzierung von Interaktion
und Gesellschaft. Probleme der sozialen Solidarität”, in
Solidarität in der Welt der 80er Jahre: Leistungsgesellschaft
und Sozialstaat, Robert Kopp (ed.), Basel: Helbing and
Lichtenhahn, 79–96.
Malcolm X, 1970 [1992], By Any Means Necessary, New York:
Pathfinder. Second edition, 1992.
Margalit, Avishai, 2017, On Betrayal, Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
Marx, Karl, 1871 [1978], Speech, 8 September 1872 in Amsterdam
after a congress of the First International. Collected as “The
possibility of non-violent revolution (the Amsterdam speech)” in
Tucker 1978, pp. 522–525.
Mason, Andrew, 2000, Community, Solidarity, and Belonging:
Levels of Community and Their Normative Significance,
Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490309
May, Larry, 1996, The Socially Responsive Self: Social Theory
and Professional Ethics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago
Press.
Mazzini, Giuseppe, 1871 [2009], “Nazionalismo e
Nazionalità”. Translated as “Nationalism and
Nationality”, in A Cosmopolitanism of Nations: Giuseppe
Mazzini’s Writings on Democracy, Nation Building, and
International Relations, Stefano Recchia and Nadia Urbinati
(eds.), Stefano Recchia (trans.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, 2009, 62–65.
Medina, José, 2013, The Epistemology of Resistance:
Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant
Imaginations, (Studies in Feminist Philosophy), Oxford/New York:
Oxford University Press.
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
Michnik, Adam, 1985, “Letter from Gdansk Prison”,
Jerzy B. Warman (trans.), The New York Review of Books, 18
July 1985.
Miller, David, 1995, On Nationality, (Oxford Political
Theory), Oxford: Clarendon Press.
–––, 2017, “Solidarity and Its
Sources”, in Banting and Kymlicka 2017: 61–79 (ch. 2).
doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198795452.003.0002
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, 2003, Feminism without Borders:
Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Durham, NC: Duke
University Press.
Moses, Wilson Jeremiah, 1978, The Golden Age of Black
Nationalism, 1850–1925, Hamden, CT: Archon Books.
O’Neill, Onora, 1996, Towards Justice and Virtue: A
Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge/New York:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511621239
Owen, Robert, 1826–27 [2016], “The Social
System”, The New-Harmony Gazette, volume 2, several
issues. Reprinted in Selected Works of Robert Owen, Gregory
Claeys (ed.), (The Pickering Masters), London: W. Pickering, 1993.
Reprinted, New York: Routledge, 2016, volume 2, 56–105.
Pesch, Heinrich, 1918 [2004], Ethik und Volkswirtschaft,
Freiburg im Breisgau: Herdersche verlagshandlung. Translated as
Ethics and the National Economy, Rupert J. Ederer (trans.),
Norfolk, VA: IHS Press, 2004.
Plunkett, David and Tim Sundell, 2013, “Disagreement and the
Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms”,
Philosopher’s Imprint, 13: article 23.
[Plunkett and Sundell 2013 available online]
Potter, Mark W., 2009, “Solidarity as Spiritual Exercise: A
Contribution to the Development of Solidarity in the Catholic Social
Tradition”, PhD thesis, Boston College.
[Potter 2009 available online]
Prainsack, Barbara and Alena Buyx, 2017, Solidarity in
Biomedicine and Beyond, (Cambridge Bioethics and Law 33),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781139696593
Renan, Ernest, 1882, Qu’est que c’est qu’une
nation, Paris: Calmann-Lévy. [Quoted translation is by the
authors.]
Renaud, Hippolyte, 1842, Solidarité: Vue
Synthétique sur la Doctrine de Charles Fourier, Paris:
Librairie de l’École Sociétaire; second edition
1845, third edition 1846.
Rivers, Eugene F., 1995, “Beyond the Nationalism of Fools:
Toward an Agenda for Black Intellectuals”, Boston
Review, 20(3/Summer): 16–18.
Robinson, Dean E., 2001, Black Nationalism in American
Politics and Thought, New York: Cambridge University Press.
doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606038
Rosenblum, Nancy L. (ed.), 1989, Liberalism and the Moral
Life, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864443
Sangiovanni, Andrea, forthcoming, Solidarity: Its Nature,
Grounds, and Value, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sangiovanni, Andrea and Juri Viehoff (eds), forthcoming,
Solidarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, Samuel, 2001, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems
of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought, Oxford/New
York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0199257671.001.0001
Scholz, Sally J., 2008, Political Solidarity, University
Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Sewell, William H., 1980, Work and Revolution in France: The
Language of Labor from the Old Regime to 1848, Cambridge/New
York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511583711
Shelby, Tommie, 2005, We Who Are Dark: The Philosophical
Foundations of Black Solidarity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press. doi:10.4159/9780674043527
–––, forthcoming, “A Tale of Two Tenths:
Race, Class, and Solidarity”, in Sangiovanni and Viehoff
forthcoming.
Shklar, Judith N., 1989, “The Liberalism of Fear”, in
Rosenblum 1989: 21–38 (ch. 1).
doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864443.c2
Shrage, Laurie (ed.), 2009, “You’ve
Changed”: Sex Reassignment and Personal Identity, (Studies
in Feminist Philosophy), Oxford/New York: Oxford University
Press.
Simpson, Leanne Betasamosake, 2017, As We Have Always Done:
Indigenous Freedom through Radical Resistance, (Indigenous
Americas), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Spelman, Elizabeth V., 1988, Inessential Woman: Problems of
Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Tajfel, Henri and John Turner, 2001, “An Integrative Theory
of Intergroup Conflict”, in Intergroup Relations: Essential
Readings, Michael A. Hogg and Dominic Abrams (eds.), (Key
Readings in Social Psychology), New York: Psychology Press,
94–109.
Tajfel, Henri, M. G. Billig, R. P. Bundy, and Claude Flament,
1971, “Social Categorization and Intergroup Behaviour”,
European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2): 149–178.
doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
Taylor, A., 2015, ‘Solidarity: Obligations and
Expressions’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 23:
128–45.
Taylor, Charles, 1989, “Cross-Purposes: The
Liberal-Communitarian Debate”, in Rosenblum 1989: 159–182
(ch. 9). doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674864443.c13
Thome, Helmut, 1999, “Solidarity: Theoretical Perspectives
for Empirical Research”, in Bayertz 1999b: 101–131.
doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_6
Tischner, Józef, 1982 [1984], Etyka
solidarności, Paris: Spotkania. 2nd Ed. Translated as
The Spirit of Solidarity, Marek B. Zaleski and Benjamin Fiore
(trans.), San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Tucker, R. C. (ed.), 1978, The Marx-Engels Reader,
London: Norton.
Van Parijs, Philippe, forthcoming, “Solidarity and the Just
Society”, in Sangiovanni and Viehoff forthcoming.
Viehoff, Juri, forthcoming, “Personal Sacrifice, Commitment,
and the Value of Solidarity”, in Sangiovanni and Viehoff
forthcoming.
Wiland, Eric, 2017, “Moral Testimony: Going on the
Offensive”, in Oxford Studies in Metaethics 12, Russ
Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1:chapter 3.
Wildt, Andreas, 1999, “Solidarity: Its History and
Contemporary Definition”, in Bayertz 1999b: 209–220.
doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9245-1_11
Young, Iris Marion, 1994, “Gender as Seriality: Thinking
about Women as a Social Collective”, Signs, 19(3):
713–738.
Zakaria, Rafia, 2021, Against White Feminism: Notes on
Disruption, New York: W.W. Norton.
Zhao, Michael, 2019, “Solidarity, Fate-Sharing, and
Community”, Philosopher’s Imprint, 19: article
46.
[Zhao 2019 available online]
Academic Tools
How to cite this entry.
Preview the PDF version of this entry
at the
Friends of the SEP Society.
Look up this entry topic
at the
Internet Philosophy Ontology Project
(InPhO).
Enhanced bibliography for this entry
at
PhilPapers,
with links to its database.
Other Internet Resources
[Please contact the author with suggestions.]
Related Entries
citizenship |
common good |
feminist philosophy, topics: perspectives on sex and gender |
nationalism |
responsibility: collective |
socialism
Copyright © 2023 by
Andrea Sangiovanni
Juri Viehoff
Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative.
The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support
Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free
Browse
Table of Contents
What's New
Random Entry
Chronological
Archives
About
Editorial Information
About the SEP
Editorial Board
How to Cite the SEP
Special Characters
Advanced Tools
Accessibility
Contact
Support SEP
Support the SEP
PDFs for SEP Friends
Make a Donation
SEPIA for Libraries
Mirror Sites
View this site from another server:
USA (Main Site)
Philosophy, Stanford University
Info about mirror sites
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy is copyright © 2023 by The Metaphysics Research Lab, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University
Library of Congress Catalog Data: ISSN 1095-5054
Just a moment...
a moment...Enable JavaScript and cookies to contisolidarity是什么意思_solidarity怎么读_solidarity翻译_用法_发音_词组_同反义词_团结-新东方在线英语词典
solidarity是什么意思_solidarity怎么读_solidarity翻译_用法_发音_词组_同反义词_团结-新东方在线英语词典
英语词典 -
日语词典
首页 > 英语词典 > 字母单词表 > s开头的单词 > solidarity
solidarity
听听怎么读
英 [ˌsɒlɪˈdærəti]
美 [ˌsɑlɪˈdærəti]
是什么意思
n.团结；
变形
复数：solidarities
双语释义
n.(名词)[U] 团结 unity resulting from common interests or feelings
英英释义
solidarity[ ,sɔli'dæriti ]n.a union of interests or purposes or sympathies among members of a group
学习怎么用
双语例句
用作名词(n.)Their sense of solidarity is very low.他们的团结观念非常薄弱。The strike fostered a sense of solidarity among the workers.罢工促进了工人之间的团结。
权威例句
Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world.Fighting climate change: human solidarity in a ...Fighting climate change : human solidarity in a divided worldHDR 2007/2008 - Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided worldFeminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity by Chandra Talpade MohantyHuman development report 2007/2008: fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided world. SummaryHuman develpment reports 2007/2008: fighting climate change: human solidarity in a divided worldSocial Exclusion and Social Solidarity: Three ParadigmsFighting climate change : human solidarity in a divided world : climate changeIntergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction
同义词unity
consolidation 同根词solidly
solidifying
solidify
solidified
solidification
solid s开头的单词Systems Operator
systems analysis
Systems Engineer
Systemic Scleroderma
Systemic Lupus Erythematous
Systems Adviser
systemic thinking
systemic lupus erythematosus
systematic approach
Systematic Risk
systematic training model
system structure 词汇所属分类Billions 亿万_财富之战 Season1&2
《绝望的主妇》(Desperate Housewives) 全八季词频大全
英语单词词频20000之1-6000
《席德梅尔的文明》
英文新闻阅读词汇
美国当代语料库（COCA） 6000-8000词 字母词汇表更多i开头的单词Izzie
izzat
izzard
Ize
izba
izard
r开头的单词ryukyuan
ryukyu
RYS
ryot
rynd
ryke
t开头的单词tea table
tzitzis
tzimmes
tzigane
Tzetzes
tzetze 分类词汇表更多建筑行业wiring
wire cutters
wire cutter
window
wheelbarrow
welder
汽车行业wrecker
wiring
wing mirror
wing
windscreen wiper
windscreen
食品行业yellow wine
wu chia pee
white wine
whisky
vodka
vinegar 人名姓氏表更多男zack
zachary
Zachariah
young
York
Yates
女Zola
Zoe
Zenobia
Zenia
Zena
Zandra
男/女Yong
wynn
winter
willie
Whitney
wally 新东方柯林斯词典 托福考试练习 雅思预测2024年雅思考试重点题汇总[听力|阅读|写作|口语]
2024年2月雅思考试听力|阅读|写作|口语重点题汇总
2024年1月雅思考前必刷题听力|阅读|口语|写作汇总
2024年3月雅思考试听力|阅读|写作|口语重点题汇总
[雅思考前必刷]2024年1月雅思口语考前必刷题Part 2&3地点类
2020年9月雅思口语新题part1：shopping
2021年1月雅思口语新题part2:你认为可以教别人的技能
[雅思考前必刷]2024年1月雅思口语考前必刷题Part 2&3事件类
2020年9月雅思口语新题part1：Activity
2021年1月雅思口语新题part2:你以前看过的现场体育赛事
关于我们
商务合作
广告服务
代理商区域
客服中心
在线留言
合作伙伴
人员招聘
联系我们
网站地图
© 2000-2024 koolearn.com 版权所有 全国客服专线：400-676-2300
京ICP证050421号 京ICP备05067669号-2 京公安备110-1081940 网络视听许可证0110531号
新东方教育科技集团旗下成员公司
solidarity - WordReference.com 英汉词典
solidarity - WordReference.com 英汉词典
WordReference.com | 在线语言字典
英汉词典
| solidarity
×
英语-中文
中文-英语
英语-西班牙语
西班牙语-英语
英语-意大利语
意大利语-英语
英语-法语
法语-英语
English definition
英语同义词
西班牙语-法语
法语-西班牙语
西班牙语-葡萄牙语
葡萄牙语-西班牙语
Español: definición
Español: sinónimos
Català: definició
英语-德语
德语-英语
更多……
论坛
另请参见：
soli
solicit
solicitant
solicitation
soliciting
solicitor
solicitous
solicitude
solid
solid-state
solidarity
solidification
solidify
solidity
solidly
solidus
soliloquize
soliloquy
solipsism
solipsistic
solitaire
热门搜索：
查看全部
solidarity
[links]
Listen:
UK:*UK and possibly other pronunciationsUK and possibly other pronunciations/ˌsɒlɪˈdærəti/US:USA pronunciation: IPA and respellingUSA pronunciation: IPA/ˌsɑlɪˈdærɪti/ ,USA pronunciation: respelling(sol′i dar′i tē)
ⓘ一个或多个论坛线程和你的搜索词完全匹配
定义 |
西班牙语 |
法语 |
英语同义词 |
Conjugator [EN] |
上下文 |
图像
Inflections of 'solidarity' (n): npl: solidarities
WordReference English-Chinese Dictionary © 2024:主要翻译英语中文
solidarity n (unity, mutual support)SCSimplified Chinese 团结一致 tuán jié yí zhì TCTraditional Chinese 團結一致
SCSimplified Chinese 齐心协力 tuán jié yí zhì，qí xīn xié lì TCTraditional Chinese 同心協力
SCSimplified Chinese 相互扶持 tuán jié yí zhì，xiāng hù fú chí
The women's display of solidarity was touching.
有所遗漏？报告错误或提出改进建议
WordReference English-Chinese Dictionary © 2024:复合形式：英语中文
in solidarity with prep (as a show of support for)SCSimplified Chinese 声援… shēng yuán TCTraditional Chinese 聲援...
SCSimplified Chinese 表示支持… shēng yuán，biǎo shì zhī chí
I'm in solidarity with the workers in their struggle for better conditions.
有所遗漏？报告错误或提出改进建议
Collins Chinese Dictionary Plus (3rd edition), 2011:
solidarity [sɔlɪˈdærɪtɪ]
n
[u]
团(團)结(結)一致 tuánjié yīzhì to show solidarity (with sb) 显(顯)示（同某人）站在一起 xiǎnshì （tóng mǒurén） zhàn zài yīqǐ
在这些条目还发现'solidarity'：
在英文解释里：
all for one
- be with
- rally around
- sisterhood
- stand next to
- stand shoulder to shoulder with
- stand with
- united front
- unity
标题中含有单词 'solidarity' 的论坛讨论：未在Chinese论坛中找到有关“solidarity”的讨论As much integration as necessary, as much solidarity as possible - English Only forum
develop resilience and solidarity - English Only forum
embrace of solidarity - English Only forum
from any solidarity - English Only forum
human solidarity as compatible - English Only forum
I learned what work for solidarity and fairness means - English Only forum
In Solidarity with or to Show Solidarity with? - English Only forum
masks are an important signal that it’s not business as usual as well as an act of solidarity. - English Only forum
new security relations which excluded the United States and which made Latin American solidarity into ... - English Only forum
playing out solidarity - English Only forum
Show our solidarity - English Only forum
solidarity as a verb - English Only forum
solidarity of proximity - English Only forum
Solidarity speaker - English Only forum
solidarity... - English Only forum
substitute for “solidarity” - English Only forum
Sympathy Vs solidarity - English Only forum
the president of the 10 October Peace and Solidarity Association - English Only forum
to call itself
to express my solidarity with or to – and alternative formulations - English Only forum
to show solidarity with - (I'm ...... with them) - English Only forum
访问Chinese 论坛。帮助 WordReference： 在论坛上提问。
Go to Preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks.
查看 "solidarity" 的谷歌机器翻译。
其他语言： 西班牙语 | 法语 | 意大利语 | 葡萄牙语 | 罗马尼亚语 | 德语 | 荷兰语 | 瑞典语 | 俄语 | 波兰语 | 捷克语 | 希腊语 | 土耳其语 | 日语 | 韩语 | 阿拉伯语
链接：
⚙️偏好 |
缩略语 |
隐私政策 |
服务条款 |
支持 WR |
论坛 |
建议
广告
广告
报告不适当的广告。
WordReference.com
WORD OF THE DAY
GET THE DAILY EMAIL!
成为WordReference的支持者，浏览网站再也不受广告的打扰。
版权 © 2024 WordReference.com
English version
请报告任何问题。
×